Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster

I spend most of my workday typing and clicking into a browser window. I hate it. When I see the catchphrases “cloud” or “hosted” or “as a service,” my brain rewrites it as too damn slow.

Google’s Chrome browser soothes my pain a bit. The latest update has been renamed from Chrome to Chrome 2. It’s not a major overhaul of the thing, but it does boost Javascript processing by 30 percent. Adrian Kingsley-Hughes at ZD posted benchmark charts. This is the one you need to see: The part of Chrome that handles browser-killing Javascript code — the software that powers interactive Web 2.0 sites — has gone from pretty fast to insanely fast.

What do these numbers mean in the real world? I notice the difference on sites such as Zipcar, which has an in-browser reservation tool, and Slate, which packs its home page with pop-down menus. Chrome hesitates less than it used to when I navigate Slate’s menus or drag my Zipcar reservation around to reschedule.

Chrome 2 also adds an auto-fill feature for Web forms, a standard browser trick oddly missing from the first version. And as I accidentally learned when I hit my F11 key, F11 toggles a new full-screen mode on and off. I don’t use it much, because Google’s product management has resisted the urge to begin packing the browser’s minimalist top area with toolbars and controls, unlike Firefox and Internet Explorer.

Chrome 2 is the closest thing yet to an embedded kiosk mode for Web-based software. One more feature I want: A way to turn off all keyboard shortcuts so my typos don’t shut the window on a half hour’s work.

[Image from ZD's Hardware 2.0 blog]

Next Story: TimesReader 2.0’s big goof: No Technology section
Previous Story: Roundup: Apple Tablet coming? Facebook book definitely is, and more

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' technology section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • Vladimir
    when one tab loads, the other ones don't work
  • You know what browser I tried that was pretty darn fast? The PC version of Safari. Firefox is still my preference though.
  • Logan
    How come no one is mentioning that the zoom function now zooms the entire page rather than just the text. That is a crazy welcome addition!
  • Editor in Chief
    Typo in second sentence: I think you mean "rewRites."
  • rush
    Typo in your comment. I think you meant. "third sentence."
  • rush
    Yes, that should have been a comma. Damn.
  • The add-on is probably for users that are use to the old windows3.1 where the sub-directory is written in C++ all throughout the 500 cm lenght......

    when you covert this to points on a scale the feature remains the same.........

    this is just the gloss that the magazine needs for it to penetrate a harder market from within......

    salil ghoshal.
  • ryan
    web 2.0 is dead and they have skipped right to web 4.0.
  • If they could make Chrome use Firefox Extensions (Add-ons) then I would use it. I like Firefox because I can add extensions that perform various tasks I want done, and customize the browser to my tastes.
  • I'm with you Craig. Specifically I'd be excited to see the New Tab King (http://www.newtabking.com) extension baked into this great piece of Chrome
    --shelly
  • I love Chrome, without a doubt it makes Gmail a hundred times better of an experience.
  • IamMe
    If the new version is 30% faster than the old version, that still tells us nothing how this is compared to other browsers. Pretty useless article considering that all it does are statements of truthiness.
  • Our site is a good example of a site where you can see a big difference. We have A LOT of javascript and some animations is javascript and the difference between chrome and firefox is very significant. I really hope (for our sake) that when firefox 3.5 come out it can keep up with chrome.

    http://flotate.com

    -Ryan
  • I've been a fan of Chrome since the start. I see these tests talking of its speed all over the place, but in every day browsing I'm no longer finding Chrome faster ,or as fast as the opposition. My default is now Opera 10 alpha, and if that should fail it would be back to Firefox beta. When a new Chrome arrives I'll download and try it, and every time it now disappoints, and that's a shame.
  • enzogames
    I've had a different experience with chrome 2. Chrome 1 was fast, Chrome 2 feels like Safari 1.
    It's slow and clunky even with 4 tabs let alone my usual 8. Firefox is kicking chrome's butt on my old athlon.
  • mattmcb
    The chrome speed dial is very cool, but sthrt.com is speed dial on steroids.