Apps or browser? GetJar vs. Google on the future of mobile services

ggThe most over-the-top statements and biggest disagreements at our MobileBeat 2009 conference last week circled the same question: Will the future bring a jillion smartphone applications, or a jillion smartphone web sites?

The BBC even reported about how executives from GetJar, the largest independent mobile app store, and Google completely disagreed at MobileBeat on whether developers should focus on platform-specific phone apps or run-anywhere browser apps.

“Apps will be as big, if not bigger than the Internet,” GetJar chief executive Ilja Laurs (left) said at one point. Google vice president of engineering Vic Gundotra (right), in a separate forum, delivered the event’s most-discussed line: “We’re not rich enough” to support multiple mobile platforms. Put it in the browser, Gundotra said.

In the coming year, this will be the biggest fight in the tech industry — even bigger than Blu-ray versus HD-DVD. Google’s browser-based approach brings the internet mindset to the phone: Products and services shouldn’t be tied to one company’s hardware platform or operating system, and it’s better to sacrifice a few features in order to have an application that will run on any phone.

Alternatively, GetJar pushes an app-centric future, in which apps built for specific platforms do things you can’t do in a browser. GetJar serves millions of Windows Mobile, Palm and BlackBerry apps to its customers and has spent years building up relationships to be the app provider for large carriers outside the U.S. like Virgin Mobile and Sony Ericsson.

Who’s going to win? Right now, platform-specific app stores are attracting developers to build for them. But in the long run, products and services built to fit open-browser standards have consistently won out over those that only run on certain devices. Ten years ago, tech industry watchdogs feared that Microsoft would create a Windows-only internet. Today, the idea seems silly.

GetJar, I’m willing to bet, is already planning for a future that runs in a browser. And when Gundotra says Google isn’t rich enough to support proprietary phone platforms, what he really means is Google doesn’t have to.

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' technology section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • Mobile apps has the potential to become more popular than web apps if all the mobile carriers and phone makers release a standard platform that allows all mobiles apps to be portable to all phones.
  • Web Apps are going to the next thing in mobile world as it will be independent of the platforms. You dont need to develop the application for different platforms..
  • Nostril-domus
    Are you sure they are against each other? I have a mobile web application on GetJar [I call it a bookmark but Getjar calls it a MSS Mobile Site Shortcut]. Funny thing is, all I did was to build the wap site and put the URL into GetJar along with an install icon and some descriptive text and GetJar build the actually installer and app automatically! This is now a mobile web app so something about this article pitting the two companies against each other doesn't sound so much as in the same line as what GetJar and Google are actually doing.

    On another note - Google has Mobile based apps and Web based apps for almost everything that they do so they too and big and heavy in both worlds.

    Both the reader and writer needs to see this from an open point of view not simply from the articles title which went only one sentence into the subject without noting that both companies promote both web and on device as well as the statements were made in two completely different forums.
  • RP
    Interesting post - but I don't think Google and Getjar disagree. Here's a link to Google Maps on Getjar as an example - http://www.getjar.com/products/15897/GoogleMaps...
  • pbreit
    Apps should *only* be used if the app *cannot* be built on the web. Too many developers are going the iPhone app route when they would be better off with iPhone-optimized web sites. Gmail and Google Reader on the iPhone-web are better than any of their app-based counterparts. And much easier to update.
  • We comment on this issue in our latest blog posting: http://trilibismobile.blogspot.com
    Let us know what you think.
  • The only reason this debate exists today is due to limitations in the mobile environment related to infrastructure and carrier policies. The infrastructure is still a bit slow and carriers are still overcharging for data plans, limiting handset functionality to "protect" users, and implmenting overbearing contract terms on its users. For these reasons, smartphone apps in today's world make as much sense, if not more, than web-based apps. However, these limitations are only temporary, much like the early days of the internet (remember being charged per minute for internet usage over a 28.8k dial-up connection) and will be solved.

    It's important to keep in mind that mobile phones have turned into nothing more than mobile versions of our desktop PC, so why should we treat them any different. The vast majority of PC apps one uses have moved to the web. As mobile limitations are addressed, the majority of the apps we use on our mobile devices will be in the cloud (web-based like the PC) and only those apps that require direct interaction with the hardware on the device, such as graphic intensive games, will be developed as apps.
blog comments powered by Disqus