How much is Twitter worth? $589 million, says SharesPost report

picture-1110

(Red notes a base-case scenario and blue represents upside.)

Twitter shares might be worth between $19 and $26, giving the company a valuation of up to $589 million, according to NeXt Up! research. The report is part of SharesPost, a private equity market allowing buyers and sellers to exchange shares of pre-IPO companies. NeXt Up! is a research firm co-founded by Michael Moe, a former senior managing director and director of global growth research at Merrill Lynch. The report is available here.

The research firm arrived at the valuation by the multiplying estimated annual revenues of about $134 million in 2013 by projected profit margins of 25 percent and a market multiple of 25 discounted back three years.

picture-164

picture-173

Putting in Twitter’s estimated net cash position of $40 million, they get the $589 million figure. In a bear case, where the company makes only $100 million in 2013, that valuation would fall back to $503 million with net cash. Both the bull and bear revenue projections fall far short of the company’s own fanciful forecasts revealed in meeting notes exposed by a hacker earlier this month. (See: Will Twitter really make $1.54 billion in 2013?)

The report says that what makes Twitter potentially more valuable than competing social networks is its accessibility to low-end mobile phones, which reach 2.5 times as many people around the world as the conventional internet access does. It’s also the cheapest way to generate successful sales leads compared to targeted e-mail or direct mail, according to the report.
picture-101

So how is Twitter going to pull this off? The most likely strategies include charging businesses for premium accounts and levying a fee on third-party developers. NeXt Up!’s research team thinks that web ads seem less viable given company culture and the fact that 80 percent of users don’t access the Twitter site directly, opting for desktop clients and mobile apps instead.

picture-155

The bullish $589 million scenario would also make the company worth more than twice what it was estimated to be worth during its most recent round of fundraising, which attracted Benchmark Capital and Institutional Venture Partners among others.

picture-144

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags: ,

Photo of Kim-Mai Cutler

About the Author, Kim-Mai Cutler

Kim-Mai was born and raised a stone's throw from Apple headquarters in Cupertino by a devout Hewlett-Packard family. After attending UC Berkeley, Kim-Mai worked for Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires in New York, Los Angeles, London and Buenos Aires. Follow her on Twitter at @kimmaicutler, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • Interesting...It would be cool to see how Twitter would execute it's monetization plan.
  • So many think Twitter is ........ (you fill in the blank) but most people do not really understand it. As its full potential gets exposed more will become users and more will take it seriously. Thanks for your article.
  • Simon,

    I totally agree. We are all at an awesome beginning. Let's enjoy the ride!
  • @ least some companies are reporting profits.
  • Only $589m? I think they under-estimate Twitter's longer term margins. Could be as high as 60%, in which case you could double the valuation. Also 25x forward PE looks cheap considering Twitter will still be growing. $GOOG trades at 30x PE, and is growing much slower that TWTR
  • AV
    I think people need to be careful with valuations. As with any private company (or public for that matter) when making projections based on speculative or projected numbers, models can be highly sensitive to the inputs. Even using the latest venture rounds doesn't necessarily reflect the truest value of a company - yes, in the end a company is worth what someone is willing to pay for it, but the limited information available isn't enough for buyers of shares on a private exchange like SharesPost to make informed decisions, even if they are accredited investors. Did a post on this issue yesterday: http://bit.ly/wftHV
blog comments powered by Disqus