Sequoia Capital reduces its web site . . . to a search bar

sequoia-capital-1Sequoia Capital, one of the most successful Silicon Valley venture capital firms, has redesigned its Web site, reducing it to a simple search bar.

[Update: Sequoia apparently is using this to measure which partners and deals are getting the most interest from visitors to its site, according to a source who requested anonymity and who got in touch after this story was published.]

Type in some letters, and the site makes suggestions based on the words it thinks you’re typing (image here shows a search for “China”).

Most venture capital firms have web sites that show off a bunch of partners standing in a profile shot, with blue shirts. Sequoia’s site had always been different, because it was full of images of the successful entrepreneurs it had backed (see image at bottom for how it looked before). However, this latest move doesn’t come that much as a surprise. Sequoia has prided itself on bucking the trend. It is quiet, media shy, and somewhat Spartan: Its partners work extremely hard, are successful, yet “don’t have a celebratory culture,” as one partner put it to me once.

Also, the firm always seemed to be drawing controversy with its Web site. Sequoia backed PayPal, and there have long been rumors that PayPal chief executive Peter Thiel had a tension-filled relationship with the firm. So when images appeared of PayPal’s various co-founders on Sequoia’s site a few years ago, people wondered why Thiel and his co-founders Max Levchin and Elon Musk weren’t given equal treatment. Sequoia then rejigged the site so that there was no apparent snub. And just last week, we wrote about Sequoia’s increasing activities in China and India and remarked on how its site mainly still celebrated the entrepreneurs it had backed in Silicon Valley (though, true, the firm does have subsidiary regional funds and is giving them more editorial freedom with their sites: See Israel, India, and China sites. Aside from a search bar, those regional sites also sport images of local entrepreneurs). Finally, the firm had even slapped another firm with a lawsuit, accusing it off copying the site. That, even though Sequoia’s site has never really looked that good: The garish green and blocky interface made it seem outdated.

So perhaps it all became too much. Rather than continue to draw scrutiny, and petty misunderstandings, why not take it all down and start again — with a search bar that looks just like Google? After all, Sequoia backed Google, and that is success enough.

sequoia-capital-home-page

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Photo of Matt Marshall

About the Author, Matt Marshall

Matt Marshall is editor and CEO of VentureBeat. Follow him on Twitter at @mmarshall, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • Mebets that they are just showing off what one of their portfolio companies can do. Try a search for portfolio, it takes you right to their portfolio. I think it is rather brilliant.
  • This is fascinating. A very interesting approach and one that I am wondering if other companies will adopt. It is a content driven site to the extreme based on search results. Thanks for sharing.
  • Oh yes, this is fantastic!!! ... Because typing "portfolio" into a search box is soooo much easier than clicking on a link that says "portfolio".

    The predictive search yields pretty lame results (unless you know exactly what you're looking for), and the most usable feature of the new redesign is the nav bar at the bottom of the page. I'll bet that tons of people will try the search box (since it is a nice appealing gimmick) but they'll wind up navigating the site using the links in the footer.

    I wonder what the over/under of this thing lasting 6 months is ...

    @iboy
  • There can't be links for hundreds of portfolio companies on the homepage, they have provided very easy to access to all of them in that search box. I'm going to assume you were one of those people that continued to use Yahoo for a few years after Google came out because you liked the directory structure.

    You have to ask yourself, what am I going to this website to do? There aren't a whole lot of things to do there, I can search for a portfolio company, I can search for a category of portfolio companies, I can search for a partner, I can submit a business plan. It does all these things very well, which is not an easy feat. I put in "social media" to see what social media investments they have, and it goes to "internet (digital media)" which is exactly right. How often does site search do that well? Never.

    Site search is almost always beyond terrible, this is a huge step to make it much better.
  • This is not better-- anybody who cares about usability should run away from this screaming in horror.

    Problem #1 - language. Is their portfolio page called "portfolio"? Or "companies we've invested in?" Is their contact page called "contact"? Or "Get in touch?" Do they have a blog? Searching for "blog" seems to indicate that they don't-- unless it's called something other than "blog". Search is hard and they are making their users play "guess the right search query" when a scan/browse action would be easier and less error prone.

    Problem #2 - scan-ability. So say I AM interest in learning more about their portfolio. Roughly what types of companies do they back (what's the search query to answer that question?)? What have they backed most recently (again, what search query?)? Who works there (a search for partners suggests "Energy (partners)")? There is tremendous information conveyed when you can scan a well-structured and content-rich page.

    Problem #3 - discoverability. What about what I'm NOT searching for? They have some GREAT content around how to pitch VCs, what ideas are VC-worthy, etc. With a content-free page, there is a 0% chance of me learning about stuff that I didn't know I was looking for.

    Problem #4 - SPELLING. Take a look at their partner page (if you can find it). Are there any names there that you might have trouble spelling/searching for if you heard it at a dinner party last night?

    We don't have to guess with usability. What they SHOULD have done is write down 5 tasks that people might do at their site and had a few friends run a few informal tests.
  • Exactly.
  • Always nice to have commentary and opinion met by snarky shit like the Google/Yahoo quip. I have a (small) patent on search technology from 1999. I helped build a $240M venture-backed company to compete with Yahoo that partnered with Inktomi and a bunch of others. Don't patronize me. I've been in this business for over 10 years, and even if I didn't I'd still have the right to my opinion.

    Do you work for or are you related to the company involved with this technology, either directly or indirectly in any way? It sure seems so, and it would be nice to know.

    The site is more usable with links to the main sections of content. The fact that they're buried on the bottom is poor user experience design.

    I'm not bothering to look at this thread any more.

    Goodbye.
  • George of the Jungle
    Bye
  • Tom
    Heres a tip

    "overflow:hidden" - type "a" into the search engine and it breaks the page. Might be a great idea - but get a web designer.
  • nooneimportant
    Horrible design! Type in "Team" and you get nothing good.. I mean NOTHING. Is this not the most important info on a VC??? I can't type in team and get the team or a list of partners. Great job.
  • StartupGuy
    I like the new design. yes it was a bit of a shock to see it at first, but the "suggestions" while typing seem to help. Once you click through almost anything, it seems like you can get to the Partners, Companies, etc.
    I do really like how when you mouseover the Partner names you can see the companies they've invested in and vice-versa if you mouse over a company it shows the Partner. As an entrepreneur looking for funding, it's important to know the domain expertise of a firm and specifically the partners, so this is useful.
    Lastly, their news and work (portfolio company careers I guess) looks to work pretty well which are at the bottom/footer

    Kindof neat to see a VC "innovate"
  • Brent
    Checkout the Spark Capital website (http://www.sparkcapital.com).

    It is like the Sequoia site (simple, straight forward) but without the search bar and with a bit more attitude.

    They launched it about a year ago.
  • Wonder Woman
    Let's not kid ourselves. Sequoia is a white man's VC firm of WASPs, and they're trying to cover that up by making it hard to get info on that firm.

    This firm is white, it's Anglo Saxon, and it's not minority friendly. There are no black people at Sequoia, no women investment professionals at Sequoia. Forget about it if you are Japanese, Chinese, or Korean. For all the talk about innovation and entrepreneur, it's sad that nobody calls them out for what they are. A bunch of racists.

    The China fund is Neil Shen's money. Neil did Sequoia a favor by partnering with them, not the other way around.
  • I personally don't like it but it is an interesting experiment will be fun to see how it evolves I am especially interested since I work in venture marketing and its always fun when people try new ideas
blog comments powered by Disqus