Backblaze sets its cheap storage designs free

backblaze-datacenter-serversBackblaze, a startup that offers what may be the easiest way to backup your files, did something cool and surprising today. Apparently, it has developed a cheap way to build storage — but instead of trying to sell that technology, it has published the designs for anyone to use.

The Palo Alto, Calif. company developed the “Backblaze Storage Pod” out of necessity, says chief executive Gleb Budman. Since Backblaze’s goal is to backup large amounts of data for its users while charging only $5 a month, finding storage at a reasonable price is crucial, and none of the existing options out there were cheap enough. For example, he says, storing a petabyte of data (that’s 1,000 terabytes) using Amazon Web Services would cost $2.8 million in fees over three years. On other hand, by building a set of Backblaze pods, which store about 67 terabytes each, you could store the same amount while paying only $117,000 for hardware. (See the cost chart created by Backblaze below.)

cost-of-a-petabyte-chart

If these pods are so cheap and useful, why is Backblaze just giving the designs away for free? Simple, Budman says: “We’re not a hardware company.” Backblaze built its own pods out of necessity, but its business is all about delivering a good backup experience, not selling devices. And hey, if another company can build more pods and sell them at a reasonable price, Budman says he’d be happy to buy them. (It’s an interesting comparison to Amazon, which had to build its own cloud computing infrastructure for its e-commerce business, then decided to rent that infrastructure to other companies.)

Here’s how Backblaze describes its innovation:

We had two primary goals: Keep upfront costs low by using consumer-grade drives and readily available commodity components and be as power and space efficient as possible by using green components and squeezing a lot of storage into a small box. The result is a 4U rack-mounted Linux-based server that contains 67 terabytes at a material cost of $7,867, the bulk of which goes to purchase the drives themselves.

Now, I don’t have even a fraction of the hardware expertise needed to assess Backblaze’s designs, but if they do everything the company says, the pods may be a promising avenue for hardware manufacturers. Of course, you’d probably want to add your own features and services, since the designs are available to everyone.

And hey, if no one takes Backblaze up on the offer, it’s still a fun way to get publicity.


Come see the most promising new technologies unveiled for the first very time at DEMOfall 09 this September 21-23 in San Diego. VentureBeat readers may register to attend the conference at a special 20% discount off our regular rate. Register now at: http://www.demo.com/f9vb2

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags:

Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on enterprise technology, cloud computing, and tech policy. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • Eldon Hoke
    If you check out their design, you'll notice that they use a horrible piece of hardware known as a SATA Multiplier. This device allows you to plug more than one drive into a single SATA channel. These devices are not terribly reliable, and when one fails, guess what - 5 drives fall off the machine at once causing the RAID to become unusable. Yeah, I want to store data with these geniuses...

    Seriously, grow some clue here...
  • murkymark
    Grow some clue? Don't you mean get a clue? I've heard of grow some balls. But grow some clue? Sounds like you need to grow some clue with the language you attempt to speak in.
  • Name
    @Eldon

    Please add a site to back up your claim about sata multiplier not being reliable, otherwise your example is too general about one failing. It's no different than a hardware raid controller failing. So that platitude is quite useless.
  • Raj
    Not sure about the other vendors, but to compare EMC Celerra to Amazon S3 using almost any metric results in a flawed comparison. They're two different beasts entirely. Both are great for different things, but not interchangeable in the least.
  • hrs2423
    Take this interesting piece of hardware and add the free ZFS file system (from SUN/Oracle) and you have resiliency and a very low cost. While you might not want this as the primary host for a transaction based system, it would be fine for archive of data. ZFS give you SAN like features and file block redundancy so that even when drives and controllers fail you can still recover. We know they will fail. This is just a component in an architecture that could be used very cleverly if given some thought.
  • It is very good of this post:Backblaze sets its cheap storage designs free.I like to see it.Very interesting.These devices are not terribly reliable, and when one fails, guess what - 5 drives fall off the machine at once causing the RAID to become unusable.Have a good time.
blog comments powered by Disqus