Crunchpad manufacturer renames product JooJoo, promises launch this Friday at $499

joojooA year and a half ago, TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington set out to build and sell a “dead-simple Web tablet for $200.”

His reasoning: There’s a giant hole in the market for a computer bigger than an iPhone, smaller than an iMac, and meant to be used in a relaxed position and location, rather than typed at full-speed at a desk or on a handset.

Moreover, Arrington’s coverage of startups and gadget makers convinced him that, despite his zero experience as a gadget maker, he could design a tablet, hire a company to build it, and then sell it through deals with big-box retailers and online stores.

The computer, named the Crunchpad, was scheduled to ship in time for Black Friday / Cyber Monday shoppers two weeks ago. It would have been a great tale of how a journalist proved his own claims for the new rules of entrepreneurialism.

But at the last minute, Arrington posted on TechCrunch a claim that the production contractor, Fusion Garage — a 12 person company set up in Silicon Valley in February — had told him without warning that they and their investors had decided to sell the product themselves. Arrington, according to email he posted from Fusion Garage CEO Chandrasekar Rathakrishnan, would be pushed aside into a marketing / evangelism role.

The Crunchpad was dead, he said. Since Fusion Garage and Arrington’s Crunchpad business co-owned the intellectual property for the device, the gadget would surely never ship to customers.

This morning, Rathakrishnan held a video conference to tell his side of the story. (Smart move, appearing in person onscreen rather than as a distant voice on a phone call.) Describing himself as “an inventor” rather than a businessman, he said, “I’m not the person I have been portrayed as in the blogosphere.”

After a long background story about how and why he partnered with Arrington on the Crunchpad (“I guess I had him at hello”), Rathakrishnan got down and dirty: “Unfortunately, Michael was unable to deliver. Michael was completely unable to deliver.”

Rathakrishnan also criticized Arrington’s Internet-celebrity approach to talking up the Crunchpad before its launch. “Publishing pictures of an unfinished product on a blog … is not a recipe for success,” he said. In Rathakrishnan’s version of the story, Arrington spent his time blowing hot air about what he was going to do, while Fusion Garage did all the work to finish the design and build the product.

thejoojooEnough gossip, let’s skip to the product: It’s been renamed JooJoo — the URL is thejoojoo.com. It’ll cost $499, it works over Wi-Fi only, and Rathakrishnan says the formal launch will be this week. He’s giving a video demo right now: “It has the graphic power to deliver full HD video on the go.” It will also have built-in e-book capabilities, he said.

JooJoo is based around a 12.1″ touchscreen, the hardest part to build reliably according to Arrington’s past posts. Rathakrishnan’s top selling point, though, is that JooJoo “gets you onto the Internet faster” by booting in 9 seconds, “the fastest bootup sequence out there.”

“We don’t boot to an operating system,” he said. “We boot directly to the Internet.”  The operating system under the hood is a Unix variant.

Pre-orders will be available beginning this Friday, December 11th.

Fusion Garage will also announce a new round of funding, on top of the $3 million the company has already raised from unnamed investors.

For now, JooJoo is one of those “it remains to be seen” stories. Will Arrington stop Fusion Garage? Will the two parties reconcile in the interest of making some money and not ending as the Internet’s latest FAIL tale? And if so, will enough customers spend five hundred bucks on one? Or will Apple debut its rumored tablet Mac and eat everyone’s lunch? For at least the rest of this week, JooJoo speculation and rumor-mongering will be a news beat all to itself.

UPDATE: Mike Arrington responded on Twitter on Monday afternoon: “There aren’t any more CrunchPad posts coming from us. It’s all in the lawyers hands now.”

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags: ,

Companies:




Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' Personal Tech section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • “We don’t boot to an operating system,” he said. “We boot directly to the Internet.”

    its great!
  • The Daily Show doesn't hold back as it covers two of this week's hot topics in a single hilarious segment.
    oto kiralama ankara
    ankara oto kiralama
    oto kiralama ankara
    minibüs kiralama
    kiralık oto
  • JooJooo sounds new for me..
  • Nice share, i enjoyed in this discussion thanks...
  • Nice share, i enjoyed in this discussion thanks...
  • interesting topic and i enjoy discussing in here, waiting for new ideas..
  • leading from search engine i got interested discussion nice
  • nice to be join your discuss so thanks hope you get succesfull
  • yes me too...agreed with everything you said here btw...nowgoogle like adroid
  • t is very good of this post:Crunchpad manufacturer renames product JooJoo, promises launch this Friday at $499.I like to see it.Have a good time.
  • DK
    I don't get it. What the hell did he expect when he first started this project with Techcrunch? Did he expect them to do coding for them? They could have used techcrunch just as a marketing vehicle (pretty good one, even though I don't want to admit). Maybe, he thought Arrington takes too much credit for his invention (probably he did), but does that really matter? Using Techcrunch as a pr machine and delivering the product quickly to market could have been much better choice.

    With the introduction of Chrome OS (or just Android), the expected life of this kind of device (which uses proprietary OS, UNIX-based or not) will be pretty short, anyway. On top of that, all this negativity created through this debacle and high price point (yes, I do think it is high, too)??? No way.
  • agreed with everything you said here.
  • Joojoo = Haahaa
    How can that "stuff" be called a tablet !!!
    There's nothing you can do with it if you are not online..
    or maybe.. there is..
    Offline use:
    Tray, eat your cereal and watch tv
    Lap board, place your macbook and work while waiting for wifi to connect
    White board, place a white paper on top, draw, write, etc.
    ;-)

    Dude you are toast ! Karma will get you !
    Next time play by the rules.
  • Tomas
    I would call it a remote display of a browser nothing more, a joke-joke .
    Glad this joke of a joo will be splashed away within 6months from apples response
    in the market.
    A couple hundred more with a grand amount of features including the web.
    Can't wait.
  • I'm sorry, can I go back to reading Hentai on my Dell Mini 9 with a **32 GB** SDHD?

    C'mon, Chandra Bhenchodaramanakrishnan, not all the gullible chut chut Americans trust the cloud. I mean, seriously. But Mikey.. oh man, nothing written down? No contracts? No performance on verbal? I think you done got owned:

    http://mindtaker.blogspot.com/2009/11/dear-mike...

    --Bolly Economist
  • Sushi Mojo
    Arrington chickened out after he saw Chrome OS.
  • divebus
    I think I've seen that guy in a Geico commercial.
  • web2.0isdead
    god awful looking product and that dude's mug isn't helping
  • ianf
    Yes, we'd all prefer that Elin Nordegren [ http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/12/08/am... ] would be the inventor, or at least the spokeswoman for the project. As for "awful looking" - that's what minimal investment budget buys you: a 2.4lbs, not very thin tablet. Rathnakrishnan clearly said in the screencast that their strategy from the beginning was to develop the tablet and then offer it to the highest (hardware OEM) bidder; alternatively to start making it themselves in sufficient-enough qualities [to recoup their investment - he didn't say it out loud but that's the gist of it]. You want a better, less "awful looking" pad - wait for Apple or Chromian OS-tablet, whichever comes first.
  • "JooJoo “gets you onto the Internet faster” by booting in 9 seconds, “the fastest bootup sequence out there.”"

    Who cares how fast it boots? My iPhone wakes up in under a second. My MacBook Pro, with Safari running, wakes from sleep in about two seconds. I "boot" either of those maybe once a month, usually just if there's a software upgrade.

    Really, if it takes you longer than five seconds to get to teh internetz, you should get a new computer. There's no reason you need to stare at some Windows or Linux boot screen for minutes.
  • Cassian
  • James
    Or a new career. This guy is clearly in the wrong line of work. We don't boot to an OS but we boot to UNIX. That's a good one.
  • Does anyone seriously believe Arrington's involvement was as worthless as the Fusion Garage folks are implying? The tablet was named "Crunchpad" after all...
  • ianf
    the fact that Arrington called it "CrunchPad" is neither here nor there. So far there are no viable indications that TC's involvement with the tablet was anything but promotional. In any event the absence of any kind of written agreements speak TONS against the supposedly hotshot-Valley-lawyer Arrington, and for Rathakrishnan's version of events.
  • sherlock
    You cracked the mystery! :). Seriously the idea was Arrington's but these ideas have been around for a decade or more, this is an execution game. I'm inclined to believe Arrington lacks the chops to create a product
  • ianf
    Now you're talking, Sherlock. Arrington's WebTablet idea was in the realm of wishful thinking packaging of existing technologies which could be sold for [entirely UNREALISTIC] $200-250 - presumably based on cost analysis for components for an initial batch of some 5000? units. Only it takes more than that kind of money to create the infrastructure to produce anything in numbers, which Arrington obviously didn't realise, or else he'd never come up with anything so harebrained as this [no offence to bunnies, they're fine animals]. So, no, Arrington didn't have, as you say, "the chops" to make anything beyond the ususal gas bags of blogposts
  • thenetimp
    This is doomed to fail. Big deal I can get on the internet. I can do that already with my iPhone There's no talk of an app store, so you can't add new functionality to it. I'll wait until apple comes out with a tablet, if they come out with a tablet.
  • agreed with everything you said here.
  • Mista2
    I keep thinking - how hard is it to take my HP Mini Note, remove the keyboard and add a touch screen?? This would still be able to run Windows, Linux and OS X up to 10.6.1, have wifi, a proper HDD slot for SSD or high capacity spinning platter, and 2GB RAM, 8 hrs on battery etc.
    Add a tiny Bluetooth adapter and I could even use my current apple keyboard if I wanted to actually type something more than a URL, or any one of a dozen tiny USB keyboards.
  • ianf
    So what's stopping you? Go ahead, make it happen, become Our New Tabletmaker Hero™, and make a million buck$ at $200 a piece in the process.
  • And... if you perform 'whois' for thejoojoo.com domain name... was registered November 10, 2009. This plan was in place for some time answering an element of the "what did you know, when did you know it?" question.
  • Duh! Called it!

    http://mindtaker.blogspot.com/2009/11/dear-mike...

    Seriously, these southasians, even my little Tamil brother Chandra Bhenchodaramanakrishnan are superior in EVERY WAY to the dumb gullible Amelicans.

    -Bolly Economist
  • Wait; $500 for what essentially adds up to a netbook with Chrome OS?
  • Is there a copy of the screencast available for the public to watch? While trying to remain balanced favoring neither side - unless TechCrunch + FusionGarage had a formal joint partnership or contractual relationship it appears that FC is free to release the product. Did FG and TC ever sign a non compete? Was FG under contract to TC to develop the CrunchPad? Did TC invest directly into FG aside from lending some office space in at TC offices and design requests and user testing that would substantially warrant "ownership" over the relationship and or product? I hate to say it but it appears that as the manufacturer and developer FG may be on solid ground legally to release their own product (maybe however not ethically).
  • ianf
    Robert, why do you "hate to say it" that [developer] fG appears to be on solid ground? Because –after viewing the screencast– they do, and that despite Rathakrishnan's having been painted by Arrington in the blog- and mainstream media[*] as some kind of unreasonable/ GREEDY crook? Oh, brother, where art thou?.

    All I can say is that that screencast [ http://fusiongarage.vivu.tv/portal/archive.jsp?... - thanks, Cassian! ] says a lot about Arrington's apparent cover-up and damage limitation action on account of his own business naïveté and incompetence. It's how I suspected all along: he promised the Singaporean guys the means to develop and bring this product to market in numbers [=quite an investment], but in the end couldn't or wouldn't deliver.... probably a combination of both.

    Arrington's claims about first waiting for a shippable prototype to woo the VCs is so much gaseous bullshit. In all probability, he finally came to him than no one, NO ONE, could bring this off at his promised $200-250 price-point AND STILL MAKE A PROFIT. So he looked for ways to back out, and found it in, as Rathakrishnan sez, "breaking the news embargo," the Nov 30th. preemptive post in HIS OWN BLOG — just as he did by posting [or "leaking"] pictures of half-finished prototype "B" in TechCrunch in April 2009.

    [*] About mainstream media – if things end up in court, remember where you read this first – I believe that Arrington's regurgitation of own "The End of The CrunchPad" blognote in The Washington Post newspaper [ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar... ] will be his undoing. Simply because in it he makes quite a few false, if not outright MENDACIOUS, claims about FG's rôle in it, and, unlike the TechCrunch, he has no control over the published content there. So there are plenty of grounds for libel in a MAINSTREAM, as in "rich," media outlet
  • Cassian
  • JooJoo sound like joujou in french which is a slang word meaning "Toy"...
  • asofaji
    Finns say "joo joo" when they express "whatever", as in "who cares"...could be the source for the name.
  • joe c
    People WANT Arrington involved? Seriously?

    Please pardon me, but the man is all hot air and disliked by most of the big internet people out there. I can't believe he actually has groupies, or that anyone believed this idiotic hype. A $200 tablet device in 2009? Are you serious?
  • John.B
    I could've predicted that a Michael Arrington-involved venture would turn into a soap opera. LOL!
  • youngluck
    Yeah... the whole thing screamed "leak"...
  • Michael unable to deliver (according to Fusion Garage CEO)? I'm sorry, but w/ no @arrington backing & pending litigation, no way I'm buying.
  • Jengo.
    I've found more people are interested in it now that Arrington is *not* involved. No pros or cons about the actual product, just the people involved.
  • Realist and blowhard-hater
    There is going to be no litigation, there are no agreements
  • If there were no agreements how come Chandra was working in Techcrunch's offices everytime I visited recently?
  • Do you think you'll be called to testify if it goes to court?
  • ianf
    He was there for the cake 'n shit.
  • And what's the source of this "no agreements" information? Oh, that's right, the side that has to convince the world that nothing will stop this from launching... Of course there were no agreements then, otherwise who'd be interested in getting one if legal action is on the horizon?
  • We'll see... whatever the case, the price basically doubled since the last time I was interested.
  • Kyle
    Regardless of how cool this tablet could be, I don't think many in the tech community are willing to swallow the horrible taste it leaves in the mouth. Not to mention the 500$ price tag, id rather buy 2 iPod Touch's.
  • These guys are out of their minds, and anyone who buys this is an idiot. For starters, they'll never get it because TechCrunch will be granted an injunction of some kind halting sales. Second... their timing is horrible. Everyone already spent $500 buying more powerful laptops that can actually, you know, DO STUFF, from HP, Acer, Toshiba, etc on Black Friday. Who would by something like that for $500???

    This thing is going to seriously redefine fail. Hope that guy enjoyed his career, because he'll be a laughingstock after this.
  • ianf
    ?what? legal injunction? If there is no written agreement —and I can't see what good it'd be for Chandra Rathakrishnan to lie about it— Arrington can sue dick. And his lame-beyond-lame Twitter "final word" here speaks volumes about his gas-baggery: http://twitter.com/arrington/status/6442811004

    And, secondly, if the device IS REAL... what "timing"? You think the whole world revolves around some tribal holiday-purchase customs of a few million affluent Americans? Clearly, Fusion Garage is not (and never has been) in position to produce tablets in droves, but may be just big enough to make a trickle of them... enough to satisfy immediate demand in their own land and thereabouts, and make some profit in the process. At least that how it looks from afar (so far).
  • Ali
    I don't see this product succeeding at that price point, but you win the thread IMHO for describing the Christmas season as "some holiday-purchase customs of a few millions affluent Americans."
  • agreed with everything you said here btw...nowgoogle like Joojoo
  • James
    Any 1/2 baked idiot in IT by now understands you can't suceeed with a new hardware platform without lots of apps. A device that only runs a web browser? Apple is going to wipe the floor with these guys. Another "foreign born founder" Vivek Wadhwa is so fond of about to go down in flames with some VC money they conned out of someone.

    And we don't boot an OS but we boot UNIX? What a charlatan.
  • I agree. I would have CONSIDERED buying one at $300. At $500? Give me a break. I really don't care about the drama with Arrington, either. I told him the same thing before the breakup happened.
  • xtmxady
    hmm, thanks for share . . .
  • ianf
    Deep in your heart you know, Scoble, that Arrington's projected $200, or even $300 unit price wasn't real. So just admit it up front (and no need to declare that you find the $500 point too high for such a Mickey-Mouse™ product as this – but that's the reality.)
  • Oh, Scooby, *how can you not* be of deep appreciation of a wonderous device that BOOTS THE INTERNET in 9 seconds flat?

    Clearly you have. no. vision.

    -Bolly Economist
  • What's with the ugly green?
  • ianf
    Acconding to http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/fusion-garag... "11:58AM That strange green tint is a trick of the camera."
  • JooJoo is a terrible name. It's possible that Arrington might not have been able to deliver in terms of features and business support, but I expect he would have been an amazing marketing partner.
  • ianf
    The name "Joo Joo" has its merits... it's short, it's memorable, who cares if to some Anglophone ears it sounds like "YooYoo" (or somewhat oriental Voodoo-ish? - you already can stomach Voodoo, why would Joo-joo be any harder?). So it delivers the Internet Joo-ice your pad, big deal. You think "CrunchPad" would sound any better, more familiar, to anyone not remotely aware of the existence of TechCrunch [=terrible, if short, company name] and its so-far infamous role in this idiot saga?

    Besides, the way I read the entrails of the bunny, Arrington couldn't deliver the funds he appears to have promised Fusion Garage for making the tablet happen (in numbers; i.e. the infrastructure, I mean $ERIOU$ DOLLAR$), at which point they decided to go it solo. If the product ships on promised date, and delivers what FG sez, the current controversy over its about-coming will be as good as any promotion Arrington could have delivered.
  • Yes, he might as well have called it "Chut Chut" for all we care.
blog comments powered by Disqus