Video ad network BrightRoll turns profit, outreaches Hulu, closes $10M third round

BrightRoll co-founder and CEO Tod Sacerdoti — pronounced “satch er DOH tee” if you don’t speak Italian — has three reasons to be happy this week. First, video advertising network BrightRoll is, according to Quantcast’s stats, now bigger than Hulu in terms of reach to Internet-using humans. BrightRoll’s ads reach 53.3 million unique viewers a month, compared to the Hulu Network’s 31.6 million. (The Hulu.com site draws 20.7 million.)

Second,BrightRoll has scored $10 million in Series C financing led by Scale Venture Partners, bringing the company’s total venture funding to $16 million since its launch in July 2006. Previous investors True Ventures, Adams Street Capital and KPG Ventures also participated in the round. Rob Theis, Managing Director with Scale Venture Partners, has joined BrightRoll’s board of directors.

But wait, there’s more: BrightRoll also announced today that it has been profitable for nearly the entire last 12 months. Sacerdoti had hinted at this last fall, when he told TechCrunch that while video ad rates were dropping, his company’s total revenue was up 84 percent over the previous year. Rather than burning through it, the company will use this round of financing to expand its technology platform, beef up worldwide advertiser and publisher operations, and hopefully increase its leadership position in America.

In the past few months, BrightRoll has added behavioral targeting to its technology platform. The company also added an option for advertisers to only pay for videos that are watched to completion by viewers.

Sacerdoti told me in a long phone call today that it’s not just BrightRoll, it’s video advertising as a whole that’s taking off. “The biggest theme we’ve seen over the past 12 months,” he said, “is that video advertising is being served for any free content, not just video content. Anywhere someone can serve a video ad, you’ll see a video ad. Video ads are going to be much more broad than TV will be.”

That bodes well for video ad networks like BrightRoll, as well as its competitors such as YuMe and Tremor Media. The thing about video ad networks is, as an Internet user, you’re not really aware of their existence. You just see lots of video ads all over the place, without being told who’s serving them. “It’s like when you watch Project Runway,” Sacerdoti said. “You know you’re watching Bravo, but you don’t think about whether or not it’s Bravo that sold the ads. Often it’s not.”

“I think by this time next year the majority of the top five to ten video properties by any measure will be aggregator networks,” he said. “The best example for this is display advertising. They’re by far the largest in reach and spending — Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL and 10 ad networks make up the top fourteen. But what we’re seeing pretty clearly from the advertising community is that the preferred ad medium is video. All things considered, advertisers would almost always prefer to run a video to talk to their customers.”

Why is Scale putting $10 million into BrightRoll? “The online video ad market will grow to billions of dollars over the next few years by disrupting the $70 billion television ad market,” Theis said in a prepared statement. That’s three and a half times the size of Google’s annual ad revenue, and more than twice the total $30 billion online ad market. The most strategic Internet investments are those that compete not with other Internet businesses, but with the much larger amount of money still being spent offline.

[Photo: BusinessWeek]

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Companies:




Photo of Paul Boutin

About the Author, Paul Boutin

Paul (paul@venturebeat.com) covers Apple & the iPhone, social networks & social media, digital music & video, and any crazy Internet story. Paul wrote and edited for Valleywag from 2006-2008, after several years with Wired magazine and Slate. He writes regularly for The New York Times' Personal Tech section and sometimes for Wired and The Wall Street Journal. He studied computer science at MIT in the early 1980s, and worked as a software developer and network administrator for 15 years before becoming a professional writer. Follow him on Twitter at @paulboutin, and follow VentureBeat on Twitter at @venturebeat.

  • NetInvestor
    Okay, so they want to raise money to scale? Because, what..they're not making money?
    I think we investors are tired of VCs dumping $$ into pump-n-dump schemes for firms not making $$.
    Scaling up an advertising network, especially one in operation for quite a while -- does not take $16 million dollars and 4 years! They've had years to scale up and million$ to do so.

    PUMP-N-DUMP, a continuation of the old 1990s-era Venture Capital scheme, aka
    "Let's 'raise the value of this firm' by dumping more million$ then sell it to the gullibles."

    "GULLIBLE'S TRAVAILS, COMING TO an IPO near you soon!"
  • bobqu
    I love it you guys will print stuff like brightroll had an 84% growth in revenues from what starting point. How do you know this number is relevant. Did they go from 1mm to 1.84mm if you don't have the revenue numbers why put the % growth?
  • This is worth repeating: "The most strategic Internet investments are those that compete not with other Internet businesses, but with the much larger amount of money still being spent offline." Good stuff Paul.
  • PaulBoutin
    Thanks, Scott.
blog comments powered by Disqus