Mobile

New York Times: Why we object to the Pulse News Reader

NOTE: GrowthBeat -- VentureBeat's provocative new marketing-tech event -- is a week away! We've gathered the best and brightest to explore the data, apps, and science of successful marketing. Get the full scoop here, and grab your tickets while they last.

The Pulse News Reader, an iPad application that was highlighted on-stage at Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference yesterday by Apple chief executive Steve Jobs, was removed last night from Apple’s App Store. (It has since returned, and you can download it here — more on that in a moment.) The app’s disappearance was prompted by objections from The New York Times, which sent VentureBeat an email with more details about the company’s complaints.

The Times’ objection was embarrassing for Apple, and it was criticized by tech pundits like Techdirt’s Mike Masnick, who said the company seemed to be “confused about its own RSS feed,” which allows users of programs like Google Reader to read the headlines and summaries (but not the full text) of the latest Times articles without visiting the nytimes.com site.

So is The Times just freaking out because someone is republishing its RSS feed? Diane McNulty, The Times’ executive director of media relations, told us that the Pulse app goes further than that:

The Terms of Use on our RSS feeds makes it clear that the RSS feeds are available for non-commercial use only. By charging for an app ($3.99) that gives users access to our RSS feeds, they are violating that provision of the Terms of Use.

Furthermore, when a user clicks on a story in the News Pulse Reader, it takes them to the nytimes.com site, which is framed within the News Pulse Reader app browser, as opposed to taking them directly to our site. (Since our RSS is not full text, once a user of any of our RSS feeds views the RSS headline/summary of any of our articles, a user can click a button in the app labeled “Web” & this opens our web site up but keeps the user within the App.) This is a violation of the nytimes.com Terms of Use.

Finally, they are using the Times name/content to promote their app, particularly because the Times RSS feed comes preloaded on the App and we are featured in their demonstration video: http://www.alphonsolabs.com/video.

Pulse was created by Ashay Kothari and Ankit Gupta, two students at the Stanford Institute of Design.

So why has the app returned? McNulty told us she doesn’t know yet, while another spokesperson told Times reporter Brad Stone, “We think it has been reinstated by error.” Apple hasn’t commented. And Kothari told TechCrunch, “We’re trying to figure that out ourselves.”

Don’t miss MobileBeat 2010, VentureBeat’s conference on the future of mobile. The theme: “The year of the superphone and who will profit.” Now expanded to two days, MobileBeat 2010 will take place on July 12-13 at The Palace Hotel in San Francisco. Register now. Tickets are going quickly. For complete conference details, or to apply for the MobileBeat Startup Competition, click here.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] the media industry — specifically The New York Times — got off to a rocky start when The Times objected to the app last June, and it was temporarily removed from Apple’s App Store. Now, however, Pulse says it has [...]

  2. [...] the media industry — specifically The New York Times — got off to a rocky start when The Times objected to the app last June, and it was temporarily removed from Apple’s App Store. Now, however, Pulse says it has [...]

  3. [...] news reader has come a long way since its infamous debut in 2010, when the New York Times objected to the app because it felt Pulse was stealing its content. Now, publishers are eager to get on board with the [...]

  4. [...] news reader has come a long way since its infamous debut in 2010, when the New York Times objected to the app because it felt Pulse was stealing its content. Now, publishers are eager to get on board with the [...]

  5. [...] news reader has come a long way since its infamous debut in 2010, when the New York Times objected to the app because it felt Pulse was stealing its content. Now, publishers are eager to get on board with the [...]

  6. [...] me during a recent trip to New York City. That’s particularly interesting since the company raised a bit of controversy with the New York Times when it first debuted. Kothari also mentioned that the company is seeing lot of interest in getting [...]

  7. [...] me during a recent trip to New York City. That’s particularly interesting, since the company raised a bit of controversy with the New York Times when it first debuted. Kothari also mentioned that the company is seeing a lot of interest in [...]

  8. [...] told me during a recent trip to New York City. That’s particularly interesting, since the company raised a bit of controversy with the New York Times when it first debuted. Kothari also mentioned that the company is seeing a lot of interest in [...]

  9. [...] Verizon chose to feature Pulse in its commercial independently. Apparently the New York Times had a bone to pick with Pulse last year, but that appears to be the only skid mark in their trail blazing. From the [...]

  10. [...] Verizon chose to feature Pulse in its commercial independently. Apparently the New York Times had a bone to pick with Pulse last year, but that appears to be the only skid mark in their trail blazing. From the [...]

  11. [...] Verizon chose to feature Pulse in its commercial independently. Apparently the New York Times had a bone to pick with Pulse last year, but that appears to be the only skid mark in their trail blazing. From the [...]