Angel investor Ron Conway: Every entrepreneur should get funded

Are there too many angel investors funding too many startups? That was the topic of some debate today at AngelConf, which was held at the Mountain View, Calif. campus of incubator Y Combinator.

The opening speaker was well-known and prolific angel Ron Conway (pictured), who argued that if anything, there should be more angel investing, not less. He said he hopes that any entrepreneur that has “the guts” to start a company gets funded.

“The more angels we have in Silicon Valley, the better,” he said, later adding, “We are funding innovation. We are funding the next Facebook, Google, and Twitter.”

Critics have described this high-quantity approach to angel investing as “spray and pray,” but Conway said angel investing is a hit-driven business. If you invest in enough companies, then you’ll eventually put money in a home run that pays off so well that it funds all your future investments.

Conway closed by citing the Black-Eyed Peas song “Let’s Get it Started,” and urged all the potential angel investors in the room to follow the song’s words.

“Welcome to the angel investing world,” he said. “Get the checkbooks out.”

Speaking a few minutes later, TechCrunch Editor Michael Arrington sounded more mixed on the growth in angel investing. There’s a worry among venture capitalists, he said, that angels are training “an entire generation of entrepreneurs who are building dipshit companies” that sell to Google for $25 million. In fact, that criticism might be extended to Y Combinator as well, which could be seen as “the king of the dipshit companies.”

Arrington said he isn’t on-board with all of that criticism, but that it holds a “kernel of truth.” Instead of investing in companies that are “thinking small and executing small,” he urged angels to fund founders who are “thinking big and executing small.”

Next Story:
Previous Story:

People: ,




Photo of Anthony Ha

About the Author, Anthony Ha

Anthony is VentureBeat's assistant editor, as well as its reporter on media, advertising, and enterprise technology. Before joining VentureBeat in 2008, Anthony worked at the Hollister Free Lance, where he won awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association for breaking news coverage and writing. He attended Stanford University and now lives in San Francisco. Reach him at anthony@venturebeat.com. You can also follow Anthony on Twitter.

  • Again - I'm here to wave a flag for Ron's view even if he doesn't need it. Due diligence is a necessary and useful process but anyone who has been around this block all agree on a few elements...namely, a business plan, the financials, the elevator pitch and other key elements angels and VCs use to determine if they will invest are wrong even before the ink dries on the freshly bound documents. Each company I've either started or been involved with 'evolves', its flexible and responsive to customer demands...the great 'A Ha!' concept that made you start the company in the first place is often left behind in the the dust of growth and early founders naivety - they change and thank goodness for that fleet of foot - it increases the chances of survival.

    And do you know what the magic ingredient of success, failure and creating a powerhouse is? Is it the plan, the financials? Is it even the concept? The sexy vertical? The hot space?

    No - its the founder and the team...its about character, perseverance, creativity, flexibility, charisma, the ability to build bridges and gain commitment, to get others to see the vision they are laying down - from would be recruits, to would be customers and ultimately investors.

    And the challenge? No spreadsheet, word document, website alpha or beta can show the metal of the founding team until they have passed through the incendiary hellish fire of a startup - so get out those checkbooks investors - you just plain can't figure this stuff out through four or forty meetings.

    Take a portfolio approach and hope the one Facebook you back covers the five hundred flops you also backed. What you really need is the emotional intelligence to admit you've made an investment mistake early and don't follow a bad investment with yet more money. Say 'Goodbye' to ego....if that's possible as you travel down the 101 leaving Palo Alto in the rear view mirror of your new Porsche...

    Founders? Go out and take over the world!

    Best of luck to all!

    Andrew
  • Your post has inspired me, Andrew. This process of looking for an angel investor is downright debilitating. Couple that with the fact that several of the VCs and angel investors I've spoken to don't really dedicate the time to fully understand our business model makes the process even more arduous.

    However, when we do find that one investor who isn't anxious to get on with their day, and who truly dedicates the time to understand the Social Entertainment Shopping concept, it'll be well worth the hardships. Moreover, I guarantee those who neglected to take the time to understand our business model will remember they were given the opportunity at one point in time, and maybe even listen more intently to the next entrepreneur.
  • I love Ron Conway! He's totally right! i think there is a process of due diligence any investor needs to have with an early stage company, but a certain amount of risk is always involved and shouldn't be avoided. Also, stop investing in clones of innovative platforms just because you missed out on investing in those pioneering products and ventures that are being emulated.

    Seek out the badasses and the bold new ideas that will change the world. Be like Ron!
blog comments powered by Disqus