Will Mark Hurd run Oracle?

After Hewlett-Packard’s dramatic ouster of CEO Mark Hurd over a dalliance with a softcore porn actress and an expense-account scandal, everyone’s wondering who will run the tech giant. But Hurd’s abrupt departure could actually answer a different question: Who will run Oracle?

Oracle has a CEO, of course, in its founder, Larry Ellison. But Ellison has long hired operators like Ray Lane, now a partner at Kleiner Perkins, to run the business while he focuses on strategy, technology — and, oh, yes, sidelines like sailing and tennis.

Hurd happens to be Ellison’s tennis partner and friend, a relationship which led Ellison to defend Hurd and assail HP’s board of directors in an email to the New York Times earlier this week.

Historically, the companies have been close, with HP and Oracle launching joint hardware and software offerings. But all that changed since Oracle bought Sun Microsystems, vaulting it into the hardware business which is one of HP’s strongholds. Now Oracle and HP have broadly similar portfolios of servers, software, and consulting services.

What Oracle doesn’t have is top management with experience in hardware. And that’s where Hurd comes in.

At ZDNet, Larry Dignan suggests that Ellison was floating a trial balloon for Hurd’s hire. I think that may be a stretch: Ellison is a passionate guy and was more likely speaking from the heart about a friend. But that doesn’t mean the thought of hiring Hurd may not have crossed Ellison’s mind.

Where would Hurd’s ascension leave Oracle’s co-presidents, Charles Phillips and Safra Catz? Phillips, a former Morgan Stanley analyst, is the company’s deal maker and voice on Wall Street, while Catz is Ellison’s enforcer and inside operator. Arguably, if Ellison saw either as CEO material, they’d have the title by now. They might bristle at a new boss. But the acquisition of Sun, with the complexities it brings, is a strong argument for upgrading Oracle’s top management.

It doesn’t hurt that the bruises from Hurd’s departure, which he initially resisted before agreeing to resign at the request of HP’s board, are a fresh motivator for revenge. Oracle has long battled it out with IBM. Now it could take on HP, too — with a chief who knows the sprawling tech empire’s weak spots.

Topics:

  • http://txtface.com txtface

    “Ellison speaking from the heart.” What heart? Might be good at running an empire – and excellent at running a yacht (with pro sailors) – but his choice of friends has always been suspect. As for Hurd, his gains for HP came from a low base, perhaps reflecting his character. At least Ellison built a company; Hurd inherited and squandered.

  • http://twitter.com/StewBaby Stewart McKenna

    I would think that he could NOT take this job because of non-compete clauses.He has too much specialized knowledge of HP's strategy and that would be a boon to Oraclebut would be unfair competition, IMHO. I'm recalling that Dave Donatelli of EMC was not allowed to work on HP storage for a yearbecause of non compete clauses.

  • Haggie

    Although there is one big difference between Ellison and Hurd. Ellison likes young, smart, attractive admins and Hurd likes old, gold digging softcore porn prostitutes.I'm sure they can find some middle ground…

  • LindaFreedmanPHD

    There really isn't any stopping people from having tennis partners. But hopefully people will pay just a little more attention to the blurred relationship thing, we call it dual relationship.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GBHUFJMB72FQBT32PAEJQNDOOM Dave Hume

    This type of idiocy will ruin USA companies. Any mad woman, and there are a lot of them, makes an odd claim and the guy gets fired. Then they hire another imperfect person and do it all over again. Management continuity is impossible in this environment. I think Hurd did the smart thing though, he gets badmouthed and exits with millions without a fight. He does not have to work! Wish I could do this! The joke is on HP and the stock holder looses during this politically correct and business impairing fight. Stockholders should demand he comes back. The HP board is insane figuratively speaking. Fire the board not Hurd.Slim Complaint against Hurd. HP should sue the subcontractor for the falseness of the claim or a block of stockholders should sue her for drop of stock value: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/08/jodie-fisher-photos-pictu_n_675056.html

blog comments powered by Disqus