At Adobe campus, Bloom Energy completes largest fuel-cell installation to date

Bloom Energy has just completed its largest installation to date of its fuel cells, placing 12 of its powerful Bloom Boxes at Adobe’s San Jose campus.

The company makes fuel cells that generate energy onsite. Each of its parking-space sized Bloom Boxes contains thousands of ceramic squares that can convert air and natural gas into electricity while producing little to no emissions.

The fuel cells will power Adobe’s three office towers (four boxes assigned to each tower) and are expected to generate one-third of the location’s electricity. Adobe will purchase methane as feedstock through a five-year contract with a Pennsylvania landfill and expects to save 121.5 million pounds of carbon over the next decade.

Each box packs a wallop – it can generate 100 kilowatts of energy, enough to power 100 average American homes. The so-called “power plant in a box” was unveiled earlier this year to great fanfare and bold assertions – the boxes, company representatives said, could one day replace electricity from the grid itself.

One selling point that fuel cells have above other renewable energies are that they aren’t dependent on weather conditions, the way solar and wind are. In fact, that’s how Adobe came to settle on the fuel-cell solution after the company installed 20 wind turbines at its campus last year and was looking for ways to deepen its green practices.

“While the wind is fairly constant, they’re not a large producer of energy at this point. Fuel cells look like they offered the best alternative,” said Randy Knox, senior director of workplace solutions for Adobe.

The company hired a professor to look at three possibilities, who deemed Bloom Energy “the future of fuel cells.” Adobe hasn’t ruled out solar for other locations – it just doesn’t work for an urban environment.

Urban areas and clusters of office towers don’t have the large rooftop space needed to install solar panels. So while solar may work for, say, Wal-Mart stores, it doesn’t make as much sense for an office building.

“At this point and based on everything I’ve seen, I would say fuel cells are by far the best solution in an urban environment,” Knox said.

Adobe’s installation is a big one, but it isn’t the first big name to jump on board Bloom’s fuel cell train. Wal-Mart, Google, FedEx and eBay have all installed the boxes. Big installations can cost up to $800,000 per box, but the company has indicated plans to produce smaller versions for residential use at around $3,000 per unit.

Topics:

,
  • http://twitter.com/ThermoJunky Thermo Junky

    With installed cost of $8/W, NG cost of $7/MMBTU, thermal efficiency of 52%, 15 year life, 95% capacity factor, 10% discount rate, the levelized cost of electricity is roughly 17 cents/kWh (only including capital cost and fuel cost, ignoring O&M cost). Including O&M costs of 4-4.5 cents/kWh (which I've heard is Bloom's costs from several sources), that puts their LCOE at roughly 21 cents/kWh. Could someone please shed some light as to how/why Bloom box's make any economic sense? Are California's SGIP rebates of $2.5/W (non-renewable) and $4.5/W (renewable) the driving force (these rebates are currently only available for fuel cells)? With the SGIP rebates, Bloom's LCOE comes down to roughly 17 and 14 cents/kWh, respectively (including O&M costs). Can Bloom survive without rebates? Also, the statement that their boxes “produce little to no emissions” is very misleading. The amount of CO2 emitted per kW produced is only a function of the system's efficiency (assuming complete chemical conversion/major products). So with Bloom's reported 52% efficiency, any system with a higher efficiency (and complete chemical conversion) will produce less CO2 emissions. It is true that SOFCs produce less NOx than natural gas engines at the exhaust pipe, but the NOx emissions produced by engines are reduced through the use of SCRs and three-way catalysts to meet emissions standards. This adds cost to engines, but they are still much cheaper than $8/W installed (less than $2/W). Should policy be technology specific (e.g., SGIP is only available for fuel cells)? Or should they be based on efficiency and emissions standards?My vote is for efficiency and emissions standards—let the economics choose the technology.

  • http://twitter.com/denizkural Deniz Kural

    Bloom Box is a generator of electricity and is only as green as the fuel that goes into it. If you put natural gas from non-renewable sources, it works with the same fossil-fuel logic of any of the natural-gas powered electricity plants. Bloom Box has to do with renewable / “green” energy as much as any fuel-powered electricity source: It is as dirty or clean as the source of the fuel.

blog comments powered by Disqus