Nokia had iPhone-like prototype in 2004, but killed it

Nokia apparently developed an internet-ready prototype phone with a large display and touchscreen in 2004 — three years before the iPhone debuted — but killed the concept for fear of it being a flop, a former Nokia employee who demonstrated the device tells the New York Times.

Ari Hakkarainen, the former employee in question, was a marketing manager for Nokia’s flagship Series 60 phones at the time. “It was very early days, and no one really knew anything about the touch screen’s potential,” he explained. “And it was an expensive device to produce, so there was more risk involved for Nokia. So management did the usual. They killed it.”

According to another employee, Nokia in 2004 also rejected a design for an online application store — something that would later be popularized by the Apple’s iTunes App Store and which was mimicked by competitors, including Nokia itself. Yet another former employee, Juhani Risku, said that the company rejected plans for a 3D user interface in its Symbian operating system in 2002 — something that Samsung and LG introduced in 2009. Risku said that his team offered 500 proposals to improve Symbian but never managed to get any through.

We’ve seen this story many times over: A company becomes very successful in a key market, but eventually that success begins to stifle innovation. Microsoft is perhaps most guilty of this phenomenon, but even it has been able to innovate when pressed — for example with the Xbox 360 console and Bing search engine.

Nokia, on the other hand, doesn’t have much to show in the way of innovation since the launch of the iPhone. The N8, its most recent flagship device, could find some fans among teens and young adults, but it can’t compete with the iPhone 4 or high-end Android phones when it comes to features, hardware, and software. Last week, the company announced that shipments of the N8 will be delayed for several weeks due to a software error. Nokia’s Meego platform — a joint open-source operating system developed in conjunction with Intel — will eventually make up its high-end devices, but that’s still far from release.

With Microsoft’s Stephen Elop joining the company as CEO, there’s a chance that Nokia may be able to turn itself around. Elop is already familiar with highly bureaucratic corporate cultures, and the company is certainly more aware now that it needs to innovate.

DB2010Getting content noticed is a challenge for everyone making apps. We’ll cover the topic at DiscoveryBeat 2010. Startups and big companies alike are encouraged to submit their discovery tactics to our Needle in the Haystack competition. Early bird discounts are available until September 22. Sponsors can contact us at sponsors@venturebeat.com. To buy tickets, click here.

  • munkimatt

    Software I can understand, but can you explain on what terms the N8 “can’t compete with the iPhone 4 or high-end Android phones when it comes to features, hardware”?

  • http://www.devindra.org Devindra Hardawar

    Where to begin? The N8 built to compete with smartphones from last year, and Nokia has taken such a long time bringing it out that it's no longer as impressive as it initially was. Its camera is nice, but most people won't buy a phone because it offers a 12MP camera — especially when the iPhone 4's camera works so well at 5MP. As a platform Symbian^3 doesn't really bring anything new to the table, and it's clear that Nokia is saving its real innovation for Meego. But when will we ever see that? It's baffling to me that people are defending the N8 when Nokia has shown time and time again that it does't get the new breed of touchscreen phones–

  • munkimatt

    Have you seen what the N8 camera is capable of? It's producing shots that are simply unseen of previously. The iPhone 4 has a stupendous camera, especially for a 5 megapixel but comparing the two really is slightly ridiculous.And before the inevitably accusation comes out, no, I'm not an N8 user and don't intend to be either. I'm an Apple and Android user. I just find some of the lazy statements being thrown around lately to describe the N8 to be patently ridiculous.

  • http://www.devindra.org Devindra Hardawar

    I've seen the shots, but who would base their cellphone purchase based on that fact? The iPhone 4's camera is more than “good enough”, as are many Android phones, general users wouldn't care or even see the added pixels. How is comparing the hardware from two devices which are *directly competing* with each other ridiculous? :P The people who really need the added megapixels would buy a good standalone camera instead.And seriously, if the fact that it has a nice camera is the big selling point for the N8, then Nokia doesn't have a prayer.

  • munkimatt

    You were the one who said it didn't have the hardware to match the competitors, right? But then you jumped straight into a discussion about the camera which, lets face it, is actually better than the competitors right now. Reports on build quality suggest it's damn good. So does it have hardware to match? Yeah, probably. Does the hardware occasionally beat the competitors? Yes, in certain aspects it does.

  • http://twitter.com/RashidSaeed Rashid Saeed

    3 years BEFORE the iPhone was released, Nokia had plans for iPhone-like device, an online application store, improvements in Symbian etc etc. Nothing came out, not even 3 years AFTER the arrival of iPhone. We don't have a Nokia device that we could call a true iPhone rival. If Nokia were to come up with something like Ovi Store, it's better they didn't. If they were to launch something like N8 (with Symbian) back in 2004, it's better they didn't!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Norman-Musngi/824659088 Norman Musngi

    thats how nokia loose their monopoly. sometimes when you perfect a “formula” innovation is seen as too much a risk

blog comments powered by Disqus