Is Nathan Myhrvold's Intellectual Ventures becoming a patent troll? (poll)

Nathan Myhrvold, the former chief technology officer of Microsoft, has insisted for the past decade that his firm Intellectual Ventures has been collecting patents to enable new inventions.

But today, Intellectual Ventures has sued nine big technology companies in its first-ever patent-infringement lawsuits. The company filed suits in federal court in Delaware against Symantec, McAfee, Trend Micro and Check Point Software Technologies in computer security. It also sued chip makers Elpida Memory, Hynix Semiconductor, Altera, Lattice Semiconductor and Microsemi (which recently bought Actel).

Is it time to call Myhrvold a patent troll? Patent trolls buy patents and sue companies in order to get royalties. They tend not to create anything innovative. The answer seems to be yes.

“Over the years, Intellectual Ventures has successfully negotiated license agreements with some of the top technology companies in the world,” said Melissa Finocchio, Intellectual Venture’s chief litigation counsel, in a press release. “However, some companies have chosen to ignore our requests for good faith negotiations and discussions.”

In an interview this morning, she added, “We can’t control how people want to label us. We are no different from any other company in the high-tech space that owns intellectual property.”

Actually, a lot of other tech companies make stuff. In that respect, they can be counterattacked if they sue. Without its own product companies, Intellectual Ventures is immune from such responses.

Bellevue, Wash.-based Intellectual Ventures has amassed thousands of patents over the years and has hired lots of experts to create inventions in-house which are then licensed to other companies. Myrhvold is a polymath and has a funny, boisterous laugh. He has expertise in geophysics, physics, math, economics, photography, and paleontology. But perhaps my favorite thing about him is he is a “sous vide” gourmet chef (where you cook food inside a vacuum-sealed plastic bag).

He has insisted over the years that he is not a patent troll. His company has indeed created a lot of groundbreaking technology in the fields of medicine, computer science and chips. So do you think he’s a troll? Please let us know in our poll below and explain your choice in the comments section.

Online Surveys – Zoomerang.com

Topics:

  • Icesnake

    It's very simple: A patent troll owns patents (nearly always for inventions made elsewhere; RamBus for example, patented an industry standard after sitting in at the design meetings) but does not produce any actual devices. IV does not produce anything (except income for lawyers, which are another form of anti-innovative parasite).

  • http://www.anaisdresses.com/amo1052.html JESSICA BIEL dresses

    Thank you and everyone that commenting on providing great traffic tips.

  • http://www.ideabuyer.com/news/patent-licensing/ Patent_Licensing

    I have to say that Myhrvold’s Intellectual Ventures seems like it is much less of a troll than it is being painted as. Intellectual Ventures does create new inventions and licenses those inventions to corporations. They also acquire intellectual property and build off of that intellectual property in verticals. This is what patents allow for and they protect the R&D capital that is invested into the development as well as provide returns to their creators. The more competitive the purchasing and licensing of patents becomes, the better it is for inventors and entrepreneurs who create new inventions.

blog comments powered by Disqus