Amazon's Android app store: an exercise in narcissism

Discount StorePeter Yared is the vice president of apps at Webtrends, which acquired Transpond, a social-apps developer he founded. He submitted this column to VentureBeat.

Why did Amazon launch an Android app store this week? Chalk it up to a case of Apple envy.

Thanks to the iPod, iPhone, and iTunes, Apple is now making an estimated $5 billion per year in digital content distribution. Amazon.com, caught by surprise, has been struggling to keep up in the fast-growing digital content market. It missed the boat with music. (Discount Kid Rock MP3s, anyone?) Amazon’s online-video service is caught in a netherworld between iTunes and Netflix. Even at its new lower price point, the Kindle will soon be eclipsed by the iPad and Android tablets; already, Apple forced Amazon to lower its exorbitant book distribution fees.

Despite these multiple failures, Amazon still wants to make a go of it. Everybody else has an app store, from Apple to Google to Nokia and even HP. Why shouldn’t the world’s biggest online store sell apps, too?

Give Jeff Bezos this much credit: He sees that everyone is vertically integrating from content to distribution to device, and Amazon.com needs a piece of this action before another fast-growing digital content revenue stream flows away.

The problem is that Bezos doesn’t own a mobile platform, so he has to horn in on someone else’s. Google’s Android, as an open-source system, allows third-party app stores, so it’s a natural target.

But embracing Android, while certainly easier than trying to machete into Apple’s walled garden, has its good and bad sides. There is an old corollary about open source: the great thing about open source is that anyone can do anything with it, the bad thing about open source is that anyone can do anything with it. Generally open-source projects have a natural center and one main branch, and it takes quite a lot of mismanagement to cause people to fork a project.

We are starting to see some wireless carriers such as Verizon start to deploy their own stores. That’s understandable, as they actually sell phones and services, and already sell content to their customers — though, like past app-store attempts by carriers, it’s unlikely to be successful.

Google’s Android Market definitely has its problems. Like Facebook, it allows any developer to submit an app, and then users can flag dangerous or fraudulent apps. However, a Facebook app hanging your browser is very different than an Android app crashing your phone. Clearly there needs to be some better application filtering and sandboxing.

But does this posit the need for an entirely new Android app store from Amazon, which will manually approve apps like Apple does with the iPhone? What’s cool about Android is that there is no Big Brother approving apps. Amazon will also offer app recommendations — a vital need in the app world, and one that Amazon’s vast stores of customer data can help in. But this is a category that others such as GetJar and Chomp fill.

The one clearly important innovation Amazon is offering is dynamic pricing, which will discount apps automatically to increase sales. But Google, which is a master at dynamically pricing ads, could easily copy this feature.

The problem here is that Google has finally gotten all of the carriers and handset manufactures in line and is shipping relatively consistent and stable Android phones. Android is finally a viable contender to the iPhone despite its early fragmentation.

Yet now, instead of software and hardware fragmentation, the Android platform has to contend with fragmented app stores. While the Amazon app store might be good for Amazon, it is definitely not good for the Android ecosystem.

The good news is that it is likely to fade into the ether, since it will be difficult to convince carriers and handset manufacturers to promote yet another app store — or explain to end users, who already suffer brand confusion about who makes Android phones, why they would need another app provider. But if Amazon’s innovations in pricing and recommendations spur Google to improve its Android Market, then Amazon’s store will have served a purpose. Just not the one Jeff Bezos may have had in mind.

VB Mobile App SpotlightCalling all developers: We want to write up your app for VentureBeat’s Mobile App Spotlight! If you have an innovative mobile app that hasn’t been featured on VentureBeat yet, submit it for consideration right away. Deadline for submissions: January 12. The Mobile App Spotlight is sponsored by The Intel AppUp developer program.

  • http://twitter.com/fattychance Fattychance

    Google doesn't allow *everyone* to use it's app store. Take for example Barnes and Noble's Nook which runs Android. They can't use Google market because they aren't part of the open handset alliance….because they aren't making a phone.Hence the very real need for a global app store for Android without such restrictions.Amazon sells many different Android tablets and let's face it…the Kindle itself will probably end up as a tablet soon enough much like the Nook.Now Google could open the market to anyone…that would be great…but they may not.

  • http://twitter.com/innov8tionlabs Innovation labs

    It is good for Android app development overall. The competition will bring better user experience for Android users.

  • http://twitter.com/couturedeamore winkie

    I don't understand the stigma in fragmentation… isn't verticalization anti-capitalistic? If you can compare and shop for computers and mobile devices from different stores and different sites, why shouldn't you be able to compare and shop for content? Apple's closed ecosystem may be good for Apple for now but it will eventually need to open up to foster development and growth. Android has already surpassed iOS in growth rate globally because Android is much more adaptable internationally. Google has been slow in creating a store that's actually retail-friendly thus the window of opportunity for Amazon… in the spirit of open-source, this is exactly what the Marketplace needs.

blog comments powered by Disqus