Microsoft’s Mundie: Tablets won't last, desktop future is “the room”

Microsoft chief research and strategy officer Craig Mundie isn’t afraid to go against the grain when it comes to tablets.

Speaking at a lunch in Sydney, Australia, Mundie said he was unsure if tablets like the iPad would stick around, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. He went on to discuss how he viewed the future of computer interfaces, which included entire rooms replacing the traditional desktop.

Mundie seems to have more faith in smartphones than tablets. He said smartphones will eventually “become your most personal computer” (this is already true for me, and most others who are never more than 6 feet from their phones). He also made a distinction between mobile and portable devices, something that I think has gotten muddy since the advent of the iPad. “Mobile is something that you want to use while you’re moving, and portable is something that you move and then use,” he said.

Mundie’s big beef with tablets, it seems, is that he’s unsure if the space between mobile devices (smartphones) and traditional mobile devices (laptops) will continue to exist. Tablets now hover in that nether space, which is constantly under attack from larger and more powerful smartphones, as well as cheaper ultraportable laptops.

Despite the massive growth in tablets at the moment, mainly due to the iPad, it’s definitely worth questioning just how useful these devices will be in the long term. In my apartment, I have both an iPad and a Samsung Galaxy Tab for testing, but I rarely pick either one up for casual web browsing. Of course, the situation is probably different for consumers who don’t make a living working on the Internet.

Mundie’s hesitation around tablets may be why Microsoft has been so slow to adopt a tablet initiative that doesn’t involve desktop versions of Windows. As I’ve argued previously, Microsoft already has a decent tablet solution in Windows Embedded Compact 7, its consumer electronics OS that will also serve as the basis for future Windows Phone updates. But the company has, for some reason, avoided developing an operating system specifically aimed at tablets. Its plan now is to integrate tablet functionality into Windows 7 and 8 — which is basically what Microsoft has been doing for years.

He also discussed a cool next-generation technology that Microsoft is working on. When looking at a phone, “instead of seeing a screen, it can beam individual rays of light into your eyes right on your retina … [so] you can look at your phone and see HDTV.” Such a technology would be useful for watching movies and playing games from your phone. And it could replace tablet functionality for some users.

When it comes to the future of desktops, Mundie said: “I believe the successor to the desktop is the room, that instead of thinking that the computer is just something on the desk that you go and sit in front of, [in the] future basically the whole room is the computer and you go in it.”

Mundie pointed to Microsoft’s popular Kinect Xbox 360 accessory as a way to enable a room-based computing environment. The Kinect has 3D cameras to track your body’s motion, which makes it uniquely suited for more interactive computing environments. Eventually, it could be used to deliver personalized health care and education to remote areas, he said.

  • http://www.rentabrant.com Brant Emery

    Errr, these will be those new small 9 inch portable rooms right? The iRooms. Weighing just a few grams with a 7 inch 3D display? …because the other “rooms” don't strike me as very portable.

  • LD1979

    Wow, talk about not seeing the forest for the trees. Techies love to dismiss tablets (namely the iPad) as an underpowered toy but they fail to realize that the consumer as always wanted computing to be as easy to use as their TV: turn on, use. Consumers *want* underpowered toys because most consumers consume instead of create. The artificial consumer demand for ultralight notebooks is going away and in its place will be tablets.

  • PeterA650

    His big beef with tablets is that he is not profiting from them.

  • http://www.cognation.net deancollins

    Kinect isnt it but i agree it's who owns the room thats important not what screen you view it on.

  • http://profiles.google.com/rtforeman R Foreman

    another brilliant microsoft move having an old bald guy attempt to read the industry. if MS had any brains, they would have had a tablet on the market before apple, but for some reason they just don't get it, it's actually quite sad. this comment reminds me of the Blockbuster CEO who dismissed streaming video, which ultimately lead to it's chapter 11.they'll wait a few years, and come out with some piece of crap wannabe product, need I say anything more than….zune…

  • jarra

    I found, read and replied to this article using a tablet computer.

  • http://www.devindra.org Devindra Hardawar

    Yah but try writing this blog post in one (including finding and editing a picture :P )

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2JOGJTKYAH4AGGTAVVWWHETEYU Jin Ho Tan

    Yes but try writing your short post using Kinect.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mikeydc Mikey Diazdel Castillo

    Didn't computers already start out as rooms?! I think I remember that the very first computers actually were the size of a whole room, like back in the fifties…right? Talking about going forward in reverse… =p

  • http://twitter.com/NormanTajudin Norman Tajudin

    I agree and disagree. It's about cloud-based services and interface devices…whether that's a phone, tablet, computer/terminal, or an HDTV. To the consumer, it'll feel like a room computer. However, I don't think you'll have a room based computer with tons of locally stored data and apps in the coming future. That's old school thinking…

  • http://www.devindra.org Devindra Hardawar

    You misunderstood the story. Kinect is just one element of what he's talking about. A connected room would be more than just a Kinect device ;)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2JOGJTKYAH4AGGTAVVWWHETEYU Jin Ho Tan

    The same concept applies. The room notion is not at the same level of a tablet or pad. You can certainly use a pad/tablet in or out of the “room”. Today, a cellphone OS has no strict desktop metaphor anyway.There is no reason why a pad or a tablet cannot be successful (or even more prevalent) than Kinect or MS's room concept. I agree with the gentleman below that it's about the apps and services, room or no room. It's irrelevant. Room is how Microsoft hope to package their services but it's not the only way.

  • http://profiles.google.com/zgehasz Zach Ehasz

    Actually I think you are all completey wrong. With the introduction of holographic displays, and the existence of movement interactive controls, it seems as though the computer of the near future will be nothing more than a pendant, watch, or other portable, mobile, device. The screen will holographically project from the device and interaction will be based on observed movement and interaction with that screen. There are already stationary devices that do similair things but project on walls instead of holographically in the air.

  • mr_vanderdecken

    Oh, wait. What was that giant tablet Microsoft had called? S U R F A C E?That was a room size tablet! It was going to save the Planet, just use it in a room. You just need to hire a few men to carry it around with you.These clowns at Microsoft are laughable. When I was there 2 years ago it was all TABLET, Touch ME,TABLET, Touch Screen, more Tablets. Windows 7 Tablet will be here before windows 7 Launch! Everyone work on tablet stuff.Told them then, you cant put a touch screen on a laptop you Morons, the laptop will just rock back and forth every time you touch it.And those dang finger prints on the laptop screens.They wanted to log in using the laptop/notebook touch screen, hello? The notebook has a keyboard?Microsoft is washed up, kaput, finished and its all because they won't listen to anyone. Not customers, not buyers, not no body.Stock is still below what it was two years ago, I hear a Fat Lady, yes I said FAT Lady, humming in the wings.I now own 6 Apple computers that work, 3 of them are tablets, and get this they boot fast and don't freaking asked for Adobe Flash updates nor do they reboot every Tuesday to all important patches.Sorry, time to ring the bell on Microsoft, let them ask for whom the bell tolls.

  • http://twitter.com/Airstreamin Airstream

    Does anyone remember Nathan Myhrvold's rules of technology development? The first one is to discredit any good idea as being stupid. Then copy it. Then claim it as their own and release it. Apple's desktop was stupid until Windows came out. Not much has changed at MSFT.

  • redfish

    The problem with that argument is that it assumes that the iPad will ever become the primary computing device a consumer will use. But most consumers will also have a desktop device or a laptop, especially with the newer generation — who are tech savvy and grew up with computers. So, all the iPad will ever be, if a consumer owns one, is an extra device that they'd have around the house.Add to that, the iPad is only an excellent content consumption device for one thing — reading blogs. Its awful for doing things like watching video or playing games, because its awkward to hold it or put it on a stand for those purposes. An iPhone, for godssakes, is a much less awkward device for games and movies, filling the same niche as portable gaming devices like the Nintendo DS and PSP.And besides, with the connected home (the 'room' — as Ray Mundie puts it), it will be easy to stream movies and games over the Internet to your TV. Then if I really wanted something for books, lets say I was a bookophile, I'd get an e-Reader. I was obsessed with blog reading -plus- I read books, I'd consider an iPad.People who are obsessed with blogs, who seem to be the biggest market for the iPad, are good at posting their opinions about using tablets to read blogs on blog sites they visit, so the view that tablets are mana from heaven is a common view you see on blogs. Blogs are a very natural iPad hype machine. However — MOST CONSUMERS DON'T READ BLOGS VERY OFTEN.The tablet is actually much better form factor for content creation than content consumption. Pen input, for example. You can't do pen input well on any other form, unless its through a peripheral. Smartphones are too small, and desktop screens are too awkward. That's why Microsoft had the right idea with Courier.

  • http://www.devindra.org Devindra Hardawar

    I'm sure there's a coherent argument in there somewhere…

  • http://www.onlinecheck.com/merchant_cash_advance_how_it_works.html tracy faust

    i completely agree with what he thinks and satisfies with the product..thanks for sharing it here.. merchant cash advance

blog comments powered by Disqus