Snapchat pays up over privacy allegations, gets slapped with 20-year probation

NOTE: GrowthBeat -- VentureBeat's provocative new marketing-tech event -- is next week! We've gathered the best and brightest to explore the data, apps, and science of successful marketing. Get the full scoop here, and grab your tickets while they last.

Looks like Snapchat’s famously disappearing photos might not be so ephemeral after all.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) just issued a statement that Snapchat has agreed to settle some pretty serious charges. The FTC alleges that the startup has been falsely claiming that messages are truly disappearing, as well as other misrepresentations.

Although the settlement agreement is not an admission of any wrongdoing on the part of Snapchat, the company has agreed to alter its marketing and privacy policy claims in accordance with the agreement. It also has to be monitored by an independent privacy professional for the next 20 years.

The two main areas of concern for the FTC are the company’s inaccurate claims over messages’ ephemerality and the company’s failure to fully secure its “Find Friends” feature.

From the agency’s official statement:

“If a company markets privacy and security as key selling points in pitching its service to consumers, it is critical that it keep those promises,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez.  “Any company that makes misrepresentations to consumers about its privacy and security practices risks FTC action.”

Touting the “ephemeral” nature of “snaps,” the term used to describe photo and video messages sent via the app, Snapchat marketed the app’s central feature as the user’s ability to send snaps that would “disappear forever” after the sender-designated time period expired.  Despite Snapchat’s claims, the complaint describes several simple ways that recipients could save snaps indefinitely.

Consumers can, for example, use third-party apps to log into the Snapchat service, according to the complaint.  Because the service’s deletion feature only functions in the official Snapchat app, recipients can use these widely available third-party apps to view and save snaps indefinitely. Indeed, such third-party apps have been downloaded millions of times.  Despite a security researcher warning the company about this possibility, the complaint alleges, Snapchat continued to misrepresent that the sender controls how long a recipient can view a snap.

The complaint also alleges that Snapchat stores video messages unencrypted on users’ devices but outside of the app itself, that users with Apple devices with operating system pre-iOS 7 can use a workaround method to take screenshots without notifying the sender, and that the Android app transmits geolocation data despite Snapchat’s privacy policy stating it does not track or collect such data.

As for the improperly secured “Find Friends” feature, the FTC alleges that because Snapchat failed to verify users’ phone numbers during registration, many users, while thinking they were messaging friends, have unknowingly sent messages to strangers who had registered with phone numbers that did not belong to them.

Additionally, Snapchat’s failure to secure this feature led to a recent security breach, and attackers were able to gather a database of 4.6 million usernames and phones. Snapchat then implemented a CAPTCHA-like feature to verify that new users are indeed human. Unfortunately, a security professional quickly found a workaround, showing it may be an ineffective measure.

The company recently released a new chat feature which it also markets as being “ephemeral,” meaning that the chat communication and video-chat content disappears after being viewed.

More information:

Snapchat is a photo messaging application developed by four Stanford students. Using the app, users can take photos, record videos, add text and drawings, and send them to a controlled list of recipients. Users set a time limit for how... read more »

Powered by VBProfiles


We're studying digital marketing compensation: how much companies pay CMOs, CDOs, VPs of marketing, and more, with ChiefDigitalOfficer. Help us out by filling out the survey, and we'll share the results with you.
15 comments
Stefania Mallozzi
Stefania Mallozzi

Weird, I didn't see anyone slapping fines on Facebook when we found out private messages aren't really private...

Mona Motamedi
Mona Motamedi

Damn! They have all the images ive been sending pete!! Its def worth a blackmail! Farahnaz Mohsenin

Lexi Sprague
Lexi Sprague

if you want real private chat check out Chadder

Brent Pelkey
Brent Pelkey

Is this really a worthy investigation of a tax funded enforcement agency? C'mon FTC. You're better than this.

Maria Meerza
Maria Meerza

thats all well and good, but seriously any user who uses snapchat and thinks its okay to share questionable photos because they are deleted (at least not accessible to the other user) is insane and maybe not aware of the 'take-a-screenshot' functionality. and amen to that George.

George Ludwig
George Ludwig

I bet that $4B offer from Google is looking pretty good in hindsight.