Big Data

4 tech companies are paying a $325M fine for their illegal non-compete pact

Above: Google headquarters.

Image Credit: Jordan Novet/VentureBeat
NOTE: GrowthBeat tickets go up $200 this Friday at 5pm Pacific. VentureBeat is gathering the best and brightest in modern digital marketing to help declutter the landscape, simplify the functions, clarify the goals, and point the way to success. Get the full scoop here, and register by Friday to save!

The settlement price for the tech industry salary-suppression lawsuit is confirmed: It’s $324.5 million.

Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe will pony up that amount, which had previously been rumored but is now confirmed in settlement records filed Thursday in federal court. The settlement, which still needs to be approved by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Diego, avoids what could have been an embarrassing trial, scheduled to begin at the end of this month. Pixar, Lucasfilm and Intuit settled last year for $20 million.

Judge Koh had merged various lawsuits going back to 2011 into one class-action suit. The plaintiffs included engineers, designers, artists, editors, sys admins and others who worked at the companies from 2005 to 2010. The workers contended that the named companies promised not to poach each others’ workers, an agreement that the plaintiffs said made the market for their skills uncompetitive and suppressed their salaries.

As large as the figure appears at first glance, it is only a fraction the $3 billion sought by the lawsuit, which could have been tripled if antitrust had been proven.

Each of over 64,000 plaintiffs are expected to receive between $2,000 and $8,000. More than $80 million of the settlement is expected to be paid out in legal fees.

In 2010, six of the companies settled with U.S. Department of Justice because of these non-poaching agreements. That settlement, which involved no fine or cash payment, required the companies to abandon “no solicitation” recruiting agreements for five years.

On its Public Policy Blog in 2010, Google echoed the other companies in saying that it believed it had done nothing wrong.

“Our policy only impacted cold calling,” Google posted, “and we continued to recruit from these companies through LinkedIn, job fairs, employee referrals, or when candidates approached Google directly.” Additionally, the companies had contended that their agreements did not push down salaries, and they opposed the employees suing together in a class action.

But the cooperative agreements about workers had been important enough to attract the attention of the top people at these legendary companies.

In one document made public, for example, then-Google CEO Eric Schimidt emailed Apple chief executive Steve Jobs to report that a Google recruiter was about to be fired because he attempted to hire an Apple employee.

Jobs’ reply: ” : ) “

In another, Schmidt told Google’s human resources director by email to share the companies’ no-cold-call agreements only verbally with competitors, so as not “to create a paper trail over which we can be sued later.”

From the evidence revealed in this lawsuit, Jobs was totally behind the non-compete effort. Google co-founder Sergey Brin, for instance, reported to other executives in his company that the Apple co-founder had declared, “If you hire a single one of [Apple's] people, that means war.”


More about the companies and people from this article:

We are Intel Sponsors of Tomorrow™, not only through our technical innovation, but through our endless efforts in education, environmental sustainability, healthcare, and much, much more. The range of computing products based on ... read more »

Apple designs and markets consumer electronics, computer software, and personal computers. The company's best-known hardware products include the Macintosh line of computers, the iPod, the iPhone and the iPad. Apple software includes t... read more »

Pixar Animation Studios is an Academy Award ®-winning computer animation studio with the technical, creative and production capabilities to create a new generation of animated feature films, merchandise and other related products. Pix... read more »

Whether it's a smartphone or tablet app, a game, a video, a digital magazine, a website, or an online experience, chances are that it was touched by Adobe technology. Our tools and services enable our customers to create groundbreaking... read more »

Intuit Inc. is a leading provider of business and financial management solutions for small and mid-sized businesses; financial institutions, including banks and credit unions; consumers and accounting professionals. Its flagship produc... read more »

Google's innovative search technologies connect millions of people around the world with information every day. Founded in 1998 by Stanford Ph.D. students Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Google today is a top web property in all major glob... read more »

Lucasfilm is one of the world's leading film and entertainment companies. Lucasfilm is an American film and television production company based in the Letterman Digital Arts Center in San Francisco, California. The studio is best k... read more »

Powered by VBProfiles

We're studying digital marketing compensation: how much companies pay CMOs, CDOs, VPs of marketing, and more, with ChiefDigitalOfficer. Help us out by filling out the survey, and we'll share the results with you.
Rob Mallery
Rob Mallery

Jeez you guys, they didn't suppress wages. Anyone at anytime could still switch jobs and go anywhere they wanted. It actually spits in the face of engineers and designers and other employees to imply that they were unable to switch jobs due to these "criminal" acts by their companies. You'd think that the engineers are owned by the companies and required to hitch a wagon to their neck like some kind of beast of burden!! The employees had every ability to take a new position whenever and however they felt necessary. There was nothing criminal happening here. Jail time... That's absurd!

Adam C Kunkel
Adam C Kunkel

100% slap on the wrist. They depressed wages for an entire industry for a decade.

Don Gooding
Don Gooding

"More than $80 million of the settlement is expected to be paid out in legal fees." At least we all understand what this is about.

Phill Becker
Phill Becker

According to the article, they wouldn't cold call poach, but would still hire from job seeking posts or if approached directly. So the only people who couldn't switch teams were the ones who didn't ask.

Michael Devellano
Michael Devellano

it better than $0 and it will make it so at least employees don't get stuck at any one of them

Brian Brooks
Brian Brooks

and they all made 10x that by the time the check was cut

Joshua Darlington
Joshua Darlington

these settlements where corporations pay pennies on the dollar for criminal activity only encourages more wrong doing. at least make an example out of a few execs.

Kate Gallagher
Kate Gallagher

It's honestly well deserved. You can't pigeon hole people like that.