Did you miss a session from the Future of Work Summit? Head over to our Future of Work Summit on-demand library to stream.
The first ever MOOC I took had 160,000 people signed up for it.
The forums were buzzing with activity. New posts were being added every few minutes. If I had any question at all, it had already been asked and answered by someone else.
But recently I have noticed forum activity and interactions in MOOCs have declined drastically.
This is despite the MOOC user base doubling in 2015. The total number of students who signed up for at least one course had crossed 35 million — up from an estimated 16–18 million in 2014 — according to data collected Class Central, where I work.
Change of pace
The first MOOCs were essentially college courses put online — they were approximately 10 weeks long and had weekly or bi-weekly assignment deadlines with a final exam. Like a college course, they followed a semester pattern and were offered once or twice a year.
But as course providers learned more about student behavior in online courses, MOOCs have evolved to meet the needs of the student. These needs include shorter courses with soft deadlines (i.e making it possible to submit assignments anytime before the end of the course, rather than having weekly hard deadlines).
Kadenze, a MOOC platform optimized for arts education, made such a switch recently. After the switch, the platform got more submissions in one month than in the whole of 2015 (Kadenze launched in mid June 2015), according to CEO Ajay Kapur.
But the biggest change to MOOCs in recent times has been that they have become more available. In other words, the number of courses that users can start immediately has risen significantly, as you can see in the graph below. (The graph shows the number of courses that a learner could start in September of each year. I chose September because it’s usually the biggest month for MOOCs.)
Previously, it was quite common to encounter a course you liked, only to discover it was already finished. MOOCs had no predictable schedule, and it was up to the university or professor to decide when the course would be offered again.
Scaling MOOCs required removing professors from the active role of running their courses.
So MOOCs are gradually being transformed from virtual classrooms to a Netflix-like experience. Most are now offered in a self-paced format or, in the case of Coursera courses, switched to a regular schedule, with new sessions starting automatically on a bi-weekly or monthly basis. If a student can’t finish a session, all their work is simply transferred to a new session.
This has led to a significant increase in the number of courses students can register for and start almost immediately.
From massive to meandering
Previously, when courses were offered once or twice a year, the students were all piled into one giant session. But now the same courses are available through the year and can be started immediately.
This means that instead of tens of thousands of people learning together, everybody is learning at their own pace in much smaller cohorts.
The downside is that this has led to a drastic reduction in forum activity within MOOC cohorts. I recently finished a couple of ML courses on Coursera, which I thoroughly enjoyed, but the forum activity in these courses was, simply put, bleak.
At one point Coursera boasted about an average forum response time of 22 minutes; that’s no longer the case.
This lack of activity isn’t true for all courses or all course providers, but there is a general trend in that direction. For example, while 40% of learners in FutureLearn MOOCs interact in their courses, less than 5% of learners tend to engage in Coursera MOOC forums, according to a study by Stanford.
Evolution of MOOCs
Part of this shift towards more availability is driven by MOOC business models. Having more courses available at any given time simply means more opportunities for people to pay for certificates, or for other additional services.
Fundamentally MOOCs as a format haven’t changed much over the last five years. What’s really changed is the how they are packaged and promoted.
Initially, everything was free — content, assignments, and certificate. But as MOOC providers started focussing on monetization, things went behind the paywall.
Certificates were the first to go. In case of many Coursera courses, even the graded assignments are now behind a paywall.
EdX has had paid courses for a while now, and Coursera started experimenting with a few paid courses a couple of months ago.
MOOC providers have found success in monetization by packaging these courses into a credential and tying it into real world outcomes like career advancement.
All the major MOOC providers have announced their own credential. Coursera has specializations. Udacity has Nanodegrees, EdX has xSeries, and FutureLearn has Programs.
And it’s clear lifelong learners are no longer the primary target. We still get to audit courses for free, but the real money lies in professional development courses.
Overall it seems students have responded well to these changes as can be seen in the chart above from Coursera’s partners conference earlier this year.
Ideally it would be great to have increased availability AND social interaction. But it seems if we have to pick one, the paying learners would prefer to have courses available year round.
I certainly prefer not having to worry about course start dates anymore. But I doubt if I will ever again get to be part of a class with over 100,000 people.
Dhawal Shah is founder and CEO of Class Central. He has completed over half a dozen computer science MOOCs and has written over 150 articles about the MOOC space, including contributions to TechCrunch, EdSurge, and EdTechReview.
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn More