What we know and what we don’t know about Facebook’s finances

Updated twice

Is Facebook desperate for cash because its growth has caused costs to far outpace revenue, as TechCrunch suggests? Not necessarily. Revenue will be in the hundreds of millions, and will greatly exceed the $150 million the company brought in last year, a source close the company tells me — pointing out that outsiders “don’t have a good appreciation for the diversity” of Facebook’s revenue streams.

EMarketer, a third party marketing research firm, has estimated Facebook will bring in $265 million this year, but it’s not clear if that projection captures initiatives such as sponsored virtual gifts. The company has been mum on its gift revenue numbers in the past, only telling me that third party estimates it has seen have been very rough. Meanwhile, another source with a good window into Facebook thinks revenue will still be along the lines of Facebook’s own earlier estimates — at last $300 million.

Update 1: Here’s the official statement from the company:

As a matter of policy, we don’t comment on market speculation or rumor about our finances. Facebook is well-positioned both financially and within the market and any thoughtful attempt to model our business should reflect that. Our advertising business has great depth and breadth. While no ad business can ever be 100% recession proof, the breadth of our advertiser base and the innovative products we offer bolster our position in the current cycle. We’ve also been closely managing the business so we can continue to hire great people and scale. While we’ve achieved certain milestones, we are deeply committed to even greater business success in the future.

Okay, but what about growth-fueled costs for servers and such? Both sources I’ve spoken to suspect those numbers are being overstated. The source close to the company says that both revenue and cost metrics are pointed in the right direction, and that it neither faces a deadly burn rate nor lacks access to cash.

Update 2: A third source, in the storage industry, says that Facebook has not been making many server purchases and is instead saving money and building its own, in house, as Google has successfully done.

What if Facebook wants to raise more money? At what valuation, in that case? Trying to calculate what Facebook is actually worth at this point is, as usual, a Silicon Valley parlor game. Our other source puts it this way:

People always forget that a valuation is based 50 percent on the market (beta) and 50 percent the specific company. Google’s valuation has declined by 40 percent (as have all other major Internet companies) — even if FB were worth $15 billion last year and executing flawlessly, their valuation would be reset by the market.

[Image via Village Voice]

Next Story: PartnerUp’s Weekly Opportunities
Previous Story: Gentrify: A web app to find your “natural habitat”

Bookmark and Share

Tags:

Photo of Eric Eldon

About the Author, Eric Eldon

Eric currently covers digital media technology and business news, especially what's happening on social networks and their platforms. He also writes and edits stories about venture capital, and lots of other stuff, too. He started at VentureBeat in the spring of 2007, half a year or so after Matt Marshall left his reporting job at the San Jose Mercury News to found the site. Eric previously cofounded a startup called Writewith, that was building editorial software for newspapers and other groups of writers. The startup didn't work out, but he learned a lot.

  • Krystalo
    Good one, TC has no idea what it's talking about.
  • Servers just aren't that expensive. There's no way they would account for costs at the level TC is speculating about.
  • angsuman
    TC is just fishing for a good story. We have been making servers for our own use and it costs about 1/3rd of the market price of equivalent servers. It is not that costly with Google's model of expendable consumer grade machines being used as servers.
  • Shadowlayer
    TC tends to exagerate, everybody knows that, but the problem at FB is real.

    They can't raise money at the last valuation, and even then it would be like a kick in the butt for the last investors, who would feel (righteously) offended for such a move.

    I would like to know why FB needs the 400+ employees it has right now.

    On the revenue side of things, even with the optimistic goal of 300M for 2008 that would still be 100M short of the 400M in costs, and if most of those numbers are right then most of the 500M in funding is gone then there's no way to cover those expenses, not without some sacrifices.
  • DebraWilliamson
    Just to clarify, eMarketer's estimate of $265 million for Facebook is for advertising revenue only, and for the US only. We made this forecast back in May 2008, before the current economic downturn. We'll be issuing a new social network ad spending update soon.
  • edhardy622
    UGGs became ubiquitous among Southern California surfers and Southern California downhill skiers, and from there, Uggs, which name comes from the Australian
    http://www.uggboots365.co.uk