Steve Jobs’ cancer clinic sighting sparks new Apple worries

Apple chief executive Steve Jobs is receiving treatment from the Stanford Cancer Center, according to reports in the tabloid National Enquirer and celebrity gossip site Radar Online.

This seems like a real “consider the source” moment, but the Enquirer has apparently published photos of Jobs looking obviously ill. Neither the Enquirer story nor its photos have been posted online, but The Daily Mail has a summary. It says Jobs appears “painfully frail and weak” in the photos. The Enquirer says it showed the photos to a physician (not exactly the most reliable way to get a diagnosis) who described Jobs as “close to terminal” and likely to have only six weeks to live.

Jobs announced his most recent leave of absence from Apple in January, spurring another round of discussion about his health and the company’s future. There was considerable speculation around the fact that Jobs didn’t offer a specific timespan for his leave of absence, suggesting that he could be gone indefinitely.

Jobs’ first leave came in 2004, when he underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer. Then he left again in 2009 for a liver transplant. In each case, Apple was tight-lipped about the reasons for his absence. All Jobs has said publicly is that his leave is medically-related.

If the reports are true, they confirm shareholder fears that Jobs’ condition is serious indeed and that they may have to face Apple’s future without him. The company’s chief operating officer, Tim Cook, has successfully led Apple during Jobs’ past absences, but Jobs is still seen as the main visionary behind the company’s products. Hence the shareholder demands that Apple’s board create a written succession policy, as well as the interest around Jobs’ day-to-day involvement in the company. A few days ago, the Wall Street Journal reported that he remains closely involved with the company’s product development and strategic decisions.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_A4HEEB3MYDXP5Q77UBVUKGEWRU JeremyS

    more absolute truth form the EnquirerFrom Rumorfix:The November 22 cover of National Enquirer features a “Michael Douglas Collapses” headline. Last month the tabloid claimed the actor only had “3 Months To Live,” now they're telling another elaborate tall tale regarding the actor's health.”Gravely ill Michael Douglas collapsed at his New York apartment and was rushed to the hospital – and now the cancer stricken star is resisting the emergency surgery he needs to save his life.”A rep for Douglas tells RumorFix that the publication's story is bogus. “No, he did not collapse as reported by the National Enquirer, who were told it was untrue when they checked for verification.”

  • Hrunga_Zmuda

    How can you report anything from those trash fake news organizations? You smear your own reputation by doing so.

  • http://twitter.com/johnbbyrne johnbbyrne

    You guys are sick to be reporting this like it is the truth. For gosh sakes, he's meeting with Obama today!!!!!

  • http://www.venturebeat.com Anthony Ha

    We report a lot of stuff that's still just rumor, and we try to offer some context about whether or not it's believable. In this case, I start out by saying the sources are highly suspect, but then talk about why the story resonates with the uncertainty around Jobs' health.I mean, I realize I'm probably not going to change your mind about this story, but the fact is that we will occasionally point out crazy, suspect rumors and note that they are crazy rumors, and that if you have a problem with that VentureBeat is probably going to be a frustrating reading experience for you.

  • http://www.venturebeat.com Anthony Ha

    You're free to dislike the post, but it's incorrect to say that I'm “reporting this like it is the truth.” The second paragraph begins with a warning about why you might not want to believe it, and the whole story is full of caveats.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NE2HX6YMPGN4BVLWLRAHJL3CFY Fred

    Ok, the poor guy has a history of cancer, so why is it so surprising he goes to the cancer center?

blog comments powered by Disqus