Unbundle cable TV, they said. It will be cheaper, they said.
Google this week “updated” (its wording, not mine) the pricing of YouTube TV from $50 per month to $65 per month. The price increase for the over-the-top internet television service comes just over a year after the last increase from $40 per month. In the space of 15 months, YouTube TV’s price has jumped 62.5%. When it launched three years ago, it cost $35 per month. Put simply, YouTube TV is dead.
YouTube TV customers are cord-cutters. That means they canceled their cable TV subscription to avoid paying increasing prices for channels they do not watch. What is Google’s business strategy here? “Let’s force new channels on our hypersensitive-to-cable-TV-price customers and charge more. They’ll love it. Oh, and let’s make sure to do it during a pandemic-induced recession.”
Every YouTube TV price increase to date has talked up additional channels. Just like before, there’s no option to skip the new channels and avoid paying the extra 30%. YouTube TV is simply another cable TV service masquerading as an over-the-top streaming service.
To keep bringing you the best service possible, we are updating our membership price to $64.99. This new price will be effective immediately for new members, while existing members will see the new price beginning 7/30.
— YouTube TV (@YouTubeTV) June 30, 2020
I can’t think of a better example of how to completely disregard what your customers want and destroy your service. I expect there will be YouTube TV case studies galore in a few years if Google doesn’t change course. The company will have to do some serious soul-searching to resuscitate YouTube TV after this one.
Let’s say you want to pay $65 per month. Instead of YouTube TV, you could subscribe to:
- Netflix for $9 to $16 per month.
- Disney+ for $7 per month.
- Hulu for $6 to $12 per month.
- Amazon Prime Video for $9 per month.
- HBO Max for $15 per month.
- Apple TV+ for $5 per month.
If you wanted all six of these streaming services, your total cost would be $51 per month on the low end and $64 per month on the high end. I don’t think anyone needs or even wants this many streaming services. Either way, it would still cost less than YouTube TV.
To be fair, YouTube TV sets itself apart from these services by offering live sports. But that’s still no excuse for almost doubling the price in three years and pointing to new channels users don’t want as the excuse. (When YouTube TV lost Fox Sports in some regions earlier this year, it did not reduce its monthly price.) All YouTube TV had to do was keep charging $35 per month for sports and whatever other channels it could pull off at that price. An increase to $40 would have been acceptable (though again, not during a pandemic). An increase to $40, then $50, and then $65 is not.
I’ll stick with just Netflix. Sure, the price goes up a dollar or two every few years, but at this rate, I’ll be dead before Netflix costs $65 per month.
ProBeat is a column in which Emil rants about whatever crosses him that week.
VentureBeatVentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative technology and transact. Our site delivers essential information on data technologies and strategies to guide you as you lead your organizations. We invite you to become a member of our community, to access:
- up-to-date information on the subjects of interest to you
- our newsletters
- gated thought-leader content and discounted access to our prized events, such as Transform
- networking features, and more